Title: Green growth
1 Green growth sustainable resource extraction
and the role of trade unions
- NFS Conference
- Ilulissat, Greenland
- 24 April 2013
- Béla Galgóczi
- bgalgoczi_at_etui.org
2Structure
- Structure of the presentation
- Background we have only one planet, not five!
- Resource and material use (the reckless
exploitation of natural resources) cannot go on
as in past - Green economy, green growth, green jobs
- Green transformation double challenge for trade
unions - Resource extraction, mining what are the major
social and environmental challenges - The case of Greenland
- What trade unions do and could do?
3Background Revision of growth model
- Long term challenge a fundamental revision of
previous growth model, above all face the
challenge of climate change, - The Great Transformation of the next decades will
be the - transition to low (zero) carbon economy
- Green growth a strategy to promote
eco-industry, clean energy and also give push
to green restructuring of traditional sectors - In 2011-2012 we see the danger of a reversal of
green policies in Europe what we see is black
austerity where incentives and subsidies into
the green economy are cut back for sake of fiscal
consolidation and affordable energy gets fake
priority (e.g. Italy, Spain) - This is in sharp contrast with 2009 green
stimulus packages - We also see a revival of fossil fuel (shale) gas
and coal
4Track record the challenge is bigger then
assumed by mainstream policy scenario
- It is clear that on basis of current policy
scenario the world is heading for a 3.5-4C
temperature increase by 2100 (IEA, 2012) - Keeping the 2C target requires four times higher
rate of future decarbonisation (reduction of CO2
emitted per unit GDP). - Global ghg emissions keep on growing
- Ghg emission reductions in Europe were more due
to crises then to systematic implementation of
climate policy no signs of decoupling economic
growth from emissions - Huge gap in Europe in term of resource
productivity (Bulgaria -Luxembourg 130), but
diversity also in per capita emissions, although
in a reverse order Luxemburg has the highest
level - No paradigm change visible yet
5 CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and cement in
MtC/yr (TgC/yr), 1980-2008
Source Eloi Laurent (2012) and Raupach et al
(2007)
6Looking beyond 2020 the 2050 Low-Carbon Roadmap
(ghg emissions in of 1990 level)LONG WAY TO GO
- 80 domestic reduction
- in 2050 is feasible
- With currently available technologies,
- With behavioural change only induced through
prices - If all economic sectors contribute to a varying
degree pace.
- Efficient pathway and milestones
- -25 in 2020
- -40 in 2030
- -60 in 2040
7Performance in decoupling economic growth from
resource and material use in Europe
- No major progress in decoupling, as the next
graph for Europe shows - Only Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Hungary and
Luxembourg achieved absolute decoupling (economy
grew with less resource use) - In decoupling, Nordic countries were not
performing well DK, SE and FI all performed
worse than the EU27 average and with economic
growth they also used higher resources - It is a general problem that no (hard-core)
incentives for higher resource productivity
exist companies are good in increasing labour
productivity, but not resource productivity!
8Yearly average change of domestic material
consumption and GDP between 2000 and 2007 by
member state
no decoupling
relative decoupling
absolute decoupling
Source Eurostat (2011)
9The bulk of the adaptation is still to come
- Current climate policy tools are clearly not
enough to reach target. If we had those (and they
would be also implemented), their effects would
be also harsher than what we see now! - The major challange for the employment effects of
the green transformation is this uncertainty - Some principal questions
- Decarbonisation through desindustrialisation??
- Downscaling energy intensive activities or to
improve energy efficiency and resource
productivity efficiency while keeping and
developing them (we need to make sure the second
option will apply) - Address carbon leakage
10Green jobs the positive agenda
- Takes a narrow perspective on employment effects,
looks at the labour market in a singular and
segmented way in isolation from the rest of the
economy - Definition problems
- Process or product based view? (with view to
their positive climate/environment effects), e.g.
are the following green jobs? - Steel industry (with inputs to eco-industry
equipment) - Construction industry (depending on product and
technology what and how you build) - Financial services /?/, IT services
- Focusing on green jobs by investments into a
green economy (taking the opportunities arising
from a new expanding sector) is indeed a useful
policy, BUT it is only PART of the FULL STORY - The green transformation should encompass the
entirety of the whole economy
11Challenge for trade unions in the broader context
of the green transformation
- Tension between their role as broad social actors
and as membership organisations (e.g. Canada oil
pipeline) - Path dependency? In industrial societies trade
unions fought the fair share of labour within the
growth based resource wasting production and
consumption model in the past - Are they still locked-in in that role /as some
NGO-s state/? - The tension appears between the role of
supporting more determined and ambitious climate
policy on the one hand, but protect jobs that
might come under pressure as a consequence, on
the other - In this context we also see divergergent
positions at different levels of TU organisations
/international, national, branch level/
12Trade union role the positive agenda active
policy role and social dialogue to meet the
challenge
- Trade unions (especially at higher organisational
levels) are engines of green policy at national
and international level (ETUC, ITUC, national
unions as TUC, DGB, Nordic unions) - Good practices at company level Green
workplace project/initiative by ETUC, tools,
manuals for trade unions - Managing restructuring on enterprise level under
pressures of globalisation, especially in
countries with strong workers participation
patterns (successful plant level practices during
the crisis in Germany, Austria, Nordic countries) - The Green Transformation is the most
comprehensive restructuring process ever faced
and will go on in the following decades trade
unions should promote this process actively! - A socially responsible and just transition to a
low carbon economy is a vital interest for trade
unions but posing also huge challenges for all
actors managing this process including workers
representatives.
13Innovative alliances between NGO-s and trade
unions
- Trade unions are committed to more ambitious
climate policy at the same time demand a
framework that provides a balanced approach just
transition - This makes a comprehensive policy approach
necessary climate employment social
industrial policy - Just burden sharing during the transition - job
quality - Trade unions developed practices of managing
change and managing transitions /they are not
anymore clinging to preserve status quo/ - Innovative approaches TU-NGO alliances
/Green-Blue Alliance in US (also at company and
project level), Spring alliance in Europe (now on
EU policy level)
14Sustainable mining and resource extraction
- The priority of a greening economy is to produce
(more) value out of less material and resource
input through higher resource productivity and
efficiency, through changing behaviour,
consumption and mobility patterns - AND NOT CHASING FOR MORE RESOURCES..TO COVER THIS
- What we see nowadays is a new race for resources,
a mining and gas boom - US and Canada gas fracking boom, new oil pipeline
to boost consumption - Extraction in Africa by Chinese firms is
expanding rapidly - Brazil sees ist future in the new oil and gas
field explorations - Mongolia is said to become the Saudi Arabia of
rare earthes - Greenland and the wider Arctic region is the next
target - Not a healthy trend, BUT still (or even more so)
we need to address the case of sustainable
mining and resource extraction and trade unions
need to develop a strategy for this!
15Sustainable mining and resource extraction
- What is at stake, where trade unions must be
aware? - - financial transparency (in order the benefit
of the extracted natural values contributes to
the wealth of the local population and not (only)
to the profits of multinational companies - - technological safety (preventing natural
catastrophes), limit exposure of workers to
health and safety risks - - labour standards, working conditions, fair
pay, decent work - - environmental standards (least possible
intrusion into the ecological balance of the
environment, recultivation of landcape and soil,
preserving biodiversity) - - special attention to pristine natural
environment (Alaska, Amazonia, Greenland)
especially if the environmental balance of the
region has an impact on the whole planet
16Greenland the challenge of mining and resource
extraction
- There is a new goldrush for mineral resources
worldwide (US, Canada, Brazil, Mongolia and now
also Greenland) - A vice President of a global mining company on
Greenland - Greenland offers relatively low corporate taxes,
and an environment that requires no royalty
payments or the challenge of having to deal with
Aboriginal land claims issues. Permits can also
be secured within a six-month window. - Question is it necessary to enter into this
race? Go for more and more resources just to feed
the appetite of a resource wasting production
model? Instead of embarking on a new growth model
based on resource productivity and efficiency? - Sure, there are economic realities, Greenland
wants to create an independent economic fundament
and given its natural resources their
exploitation seems to be unavoidable for the
well-being of ist 58 thousand population
17Greenland mining and resource extraction projects
- Although not one mining or oil project started
yet, more than 100 exploration licenses were
awarded. - The big hope for the mining companies now is that
Greenland will permit to extract uranium as a
by-product from rare earth deposits (largest in
the world outside of China that now has 90 of
global production. - Alcoa plans to bring 3000 workers from China.
- Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd. - plans to
extract 40,000 tons of rare earth metals per
year, with some uranium as a by-product. - Hudson Resources, (White Mountain) - access to
27.4 million tonnes of rare earth minerals. - London Mining Plc. - 2 billion Isua iron-ore
project 700 permanent jobs, 2,000 Chinese
workers for its construction.
18Sustainable mining and resource extraction
Canada - a conflict case for trade unions
- Conflict case, Keystone XL Oil pipeline, Canada
- The development of tar sands oil supply (twice
the amount of carbon dioxide as other oil
reserves) is a huge risk for the climate... - Unions should not only bear the interests of
their own members in mind, but also wider risks.
To offer support for the Keystone XL pipeline,
the AFL-CIO won a few construction jobs and a
little money at huge external costs - The Murray River coal project (Canada) create up
to 600 permanent jobs, and in 30 years three
billion tonnes of coal. Chinese investment and
the project was welcome, only the workers not,
(Trade unions filed a court case against the use
of foreign workers but support the project). - LESSONS for TRADE UNIONS for the proper BALANCE
19Sustainable mining and resource extraction tools
for trade unions
- Sustainable mining principles, guidelines
- Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative
(EITI) 32 countries produced EITI reports, from
Europe only Norway (Greenland should join!) - The EITI Criteria
- -Regular publication of reports on all material
oil, gas and mining payments by companies to
governments (payments) - -Civil society is actively engaged (design,
monitoring and evaluation) - -A public, financially sustainable work plan
developed by the host government - OECD, International Investment Agreements Survey
of Environmental, Labour and Anti-corruption
issues, 27 February 2007 - ITUC Briefing note on Bilateral Investment
Treaties (BIT) - New BITs must contain clauses in respect of OECD
Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the
ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles
concerning Multinational Enterprises
20Sustainable mining and resource extraction
summary of challenges for trade unions
- Addressed (even if not fully) transparency,
distribution, direct environmental effects on
population, flora, fauna - For direct safety risks and related direct
environmental effects also have attention (like
oil spills, or water contamination) push for
higher standards through lessons (Deep Water
Horizon) - Less focus however on long term consequences and
environmental impacts here we only have
one-sided declarations and corporate social
responsibility initiatives from companies this
is clearly not enough, TU-s should push for more - BUT Towards Sustainable Mining (TSM) reporting
(Canada) for mining companies is useful needs
to be binding (trade unions to urge) - For social aspects we have the ILO norms as
basic guidance, European social standards and
national standards (either by Labour Law minimum
criteria or through collective agreements)
21Greenland the challenge of mining and resource
extraction
- Greenland is a special case from an other
aspect, also it is a pristine landscape and its
ecological balance is critical for the whole
planet (in this regard only Amazonia is
comparable). - It would be an illusion however that a proposal
could be raised, as the aborted attempt at the
Yasuni Natural Reserve (Equador) where a
compensation of cca. 2.7 bn USD was discussed to
prevent the project. - We cannot expect this in case of Greenland. BUT
at least the limits of extraction activity should
be addressed! - Nordic countries, Denmark and also the EU
(although Greenland is not part of it) should pay
more attention! - But the EU is more aiming at special mining
rights in Greenland (not granted, but a
Memorandum of Understanding on the EUs access
had been signed in 2012) - The EU also rejected a ban on oil drilling in the
Arctic region (October 2012) - PRESSURE on the EU from a NORDIC Alliance?
22Greenlands large scale law relaxation labour
law
- The Law on large-scale projects in Greenland
- New legislation to encourage foreign investments
in large-scale projects through reducing labour
standards (only to building and construction
activities linked to the exploitation of
minerals) - The foreign workers will be entitled to the same
labour rights as Greenlandic workers, (right to
strike, to organize and collective bargaining). - BUT foreign employees, who are subject to a
foreign CB agreement will be allowed to maintain
the salary and employment conditions of their CB
agreement if in accordance with Greenlandic
legislation. - The foreign workers are also entitled to a
certain minimum wage equivalent to the
Greenlandic (with a limitation on possible
deductions) - Local trade unions, employer's associations and
NGOs are entitled to have access to the
collective agreements.
23Greenlands large scale law relaxation labour
law
- Issues for trade unions
- It is a fundamental question however do resource
extraction investments need special treatment and
preferences? (possibly no) - Incentives by countries to attract manufacturing
investment is a different matter (these can be
moved) - not relevant for resource extraction) - Greenland has unique rare earth deposits, it does
not need to give away concessions cheap! Why
preferential treatment? Is the Large scale law
necessary? More self-confidence needed! - Mining only starts now, a broader impact on the
wider environment is not yet to be expected, but
it is already time to think about the limits - It is necessary to implement the highest
environment and safety standards for the
immediate effects (contamination of soil,
water/ice masses, prevent possible spills, leaks,
etc)
24Recommendations for trade unions
- Clarify responsibility of investors in case of
potential accidents - Recultivation obligations after extraction
activity ends - For labour effects, Greenland has a different
context then countries with a larger population
(and population density) - The conflict situation in countries with larger
population appears in the substitution effect
between foreign and local labour - Preserving existing labour standards is an utmost
priority, the danger of a crowding out effect by
foreign labour is less the case - Investors should pay attention to include
domestic labour and also provide training for
tasks that can be performed - Local labour content maximisation according to
potential should be a criterion! - USE the power of the Alliance of Nordic Countries
to agree on sustainable mining and social
standards also in Greenland - NGO-trade union alliances are ideal to increase
influence on resource extraction, mining issues