Title: Courts and the Party-state
1Courts and the Party-state
- Courts beholden to local party-state
- No tenure for judges
- Local government controls funding
- Local party committee and party political-legal
committee (?????) - Have influence over
- Court personnel
- (technically Peoples Congress authority of
personnel) - Acceptance of cases
- Handling of cases
2???????????????????????????????
???? ( 2007-12-26 ?01? )
????? ??? ? ????12?25?? (?????????)??????????????????????25?????????????????????????????????????,????????????????????,??????????????????????,?????????????????,?????????,???????????,???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????,??????????????????,????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????,??????????????????????,?????????????????????????????????????,??????????????,??????????????????????,????????,????????,????????,?????????????
3The Court Structure
- Court hierarchy
- Supervisory responsibilities (contrast appellate
courts, Lubman, 295) - Merit/demerit system
- Upham judges taking a mistaken position face
possible fines, loss of bonus, or even dismissal - Time limits on cases (not mediationslow)
- Overturned judgments (mediationcant be
overturned) - Mediation rate (politically promoted)
- Supreme Peoples Court (center)
- Higher-level peoples courts (prov)
- Intermediate-level peoples courts (prefect)
- May be court of first instance if
- High-level gov dept involved
- Large amount of money involved, etc.
- Basic-level peoples courts (county)
- Peoples Tribunals (some townships)
4Courts and Judges
- 3,133 basic-level peoples courts (2004)
- with 148,555 judges (??),
- of which 91,099 were front-line judges
- (????) (i.e. those hearing cases),
- reduction of 13.07 percent from 2000
- may reflect a new emphasis on training and
appropriate educational attainment - Background
- 250,000 judges in 1997
- Many transferred from military, party
5Training of Judges
- Judicial training college established 1997
- Judges Law 1995
- Required college degree
- Judges in place could acquire degree over time
- 1987 17 of judges had college degrees
- 1992 66.6 of judges had college degrees
- ? Note night school, party school phenomenon
6(No Transcript)
7Case Typology
- Administrative
- Cases against government (ALL 1989)
- Civil (including economic)
- Family law, debts, contracts, personal injury,
land - Labor (separate division)
- Criminal
- Enforcement court
- Handles applications for compulsory enforcement
8(No Transcript)
9Perceptions of Judges
- Lawyer Dai on
- Judges in Anxiang County, Hunan
- Judge in Haidian District, Beijing
10Debate/discussion
- Debate Sending Law to the Countryside (Frank
Upham on Zhu Suli) - Zhu native resources ? Why?
- Not because of
- Chinese tradition,
- Asian values,
- Social connections (guanxi ??)
- Rather
- Institutional weakness
11Debate/discussion
- Debate Sending Law to the Countryside (Frank
Upham on Zhu Suli) - Judicial independence
- Why does Zhu support the role of adjudication
committees? - Why does Upham see this as problematic?
12Debate/discussion
- Situational justice / morality play
- Policeman Wang and college grad
- Farmer who lost a leg
- Note the political backdrop
- Local party leaders evaluated by their party
superiors on indicators of social stability - protests, stikes, demonstrations, violence in
their jurisdiction - ? is a basis for demerits
13Debate/discussion
- Debate Sending Law to the Countryside (Frank
Upham on Zhu Suli) - Meaning of judicial independence
- Why does Zhu support the role of adjudication
committees? - Low level of professional sophistication of many
judges - Social, institutional support against local
pressure on judges - ? Really promotes local judicial independence
- Why does Upham see this as problematic?
- ? Really a means of party control
14Debate/discussion
- Debate Sending Law to the Countryside (Frank
Upham on Zhu Suli) - Why does Zhu think demobilized military officers
make good judges? - Why does Upham or He Weifang see this as
problematic?
15Debate/discussion
- Debate Sending Law to the Countryside (Frank
Upham on Zhu Suli) - Why does Zhu think demobilized military officers
make good judges? - Why does Upham or He Weifang see this as
problematic?
16Judicial mediation
- Judicial mediation vs. formal judgments
- Problematic formal judgments
- Land disputes link to social stability
- Sales non-payment dispute link to labor
- Contradictory trends
- Data ? why?
- New policy emphasis on mediation ? why?
17(No Transcript)
18Enforcement
- Enforcement
- Martin Shapiro (1981 13) writes,
- In most societies courts have had only the most
rudimentary enforcement mechanisms Courts
typically do not monitor compliance, and they
re-intervene to exact compliance only at the
request of one of the parties. The
re-intervention often takes the form of a simple
repetition of the previous order. The successful
suitor even in a modern industrial society
frequently finds that the decree is only the
first in a long series of painful, expensive, and
often inconclusive steps aimed at getting his
remedy. Courts, we are repeatedly and rightly
told, have neither the purse nor the sword.
19Enforcement
- Chinahigher expectation of enforcement?
- Local protectionism
20Discussion
- Define adjudication
- Bureaucratic rather than adjudicatory organs
21Discussion
- Urban vs. rural norms Zhu (p. 8)
- Zhu rural bargaining highly constrained urban
highly competitive, complete well-functioning
markets (ask then why courts at all?) - Upham this is a linear version of modernization
theory
22The Law and Development Movement
- Note areas of emphasis in international legal aid
weve seen so far - Legislative drafting
- Judicial training
- ? Which is more valuable?
23(No Transcript)
24- Legal profession
- State supervisednot self-regulating
- Ministry of Justice
- Administers bar exam, certifies lawyers, licenses
firms - Exercises supervision of lawyers
- Bar associations (often headed by MoJ officials)
25- Supply of lawyers and litigious cultures
- Cultural or institutional?
- Peng (200032) Japan, Taiwan, S. Korea
lawyerless wonderlands - China2002 per capita income US 960
- Korea2002 per capita income US 11,280
- Chinaone lawyer for every 9,510 people
- Koreaone lawyer for every 9,383 people.
- In 2004, Shanghai alone had more than 6,000
lawyers in 592 law firms, while Korea had 6,273
lawyers in 258 law firms nationwide
26- Consulting a lawyer significant factor in
escalating a dispute, e.g. litigating (Landry,
RDI) - Contrast Michelson lawyers as gatekeepers
- Students of contemporary China have uncritically
assumed that lawyers open courtroom doors Why
are so few grievances transformed into legal
claims?
27- Lawyers as a force for social change
- Public interest lawyers
- Supreme Peoples Procuratorate
- Encourage local procurates to bring pilot cases
in the public interest - Henan loss of state-owned assets, environmental
pollution, market, industrial and administrative
monopolies and the destruction of natural
resources or public facilities - arguably at odds with the standing requirements
for civil litigation as stipulated in the Chinese
Civil Procedure Code, but the procuracy and
courts agreed to overlook - Individual lawyers (Qiao Zhanxiang v. Ministry of
Railways ) - train price ticket increases during the Spring
Festival, the biggest travel holiday on the
Chinese calendar, were in violation of the Price
Control Law - hosted a local talk show answering callers
questions on traffic law - Qiao lost his cases in Beijing Intermediate and
High Courts, but won his case in the court of
public opinion. During the subsequent Spring
Festival, the Ministry of Railways held a hearing
on contemplated price increases. - case selected to highlight the need for
transparent administrative processes - Titi Liu (UW) Jan 24th 12noon 317 Thomson
- NGOs (Beijing Univ. Law Depts Center for Womens
Law Stds and Legal Services - C. David Lee, Legal Reform in China A Role for
Nongovernmental Organizations, Yale J. of Intl
Law Vol. 25 (2000 - Lawyering in repressive states
- Jane Winn (UW) and Tang-chi Yeh, Advocating
Democracy The Role of Lawyers in Taiwan's
Political Transformation, Law Social Inquiry,
Vol. 20, No. 2. (Spring, 1995), pp. 561-599.
28- Legal Aid
- Regulations on Legal Aid by the State Council in
2003 - Duty of county-level governments
- Narrow scope for qualifying for legal aid
- No recourse for denial of legal aid
- Private lawyers de facto compulsory provision of
legal aid - foreign donor activity
- educated the National Legal Aid Center, the
organization charged by the Ministry of Justice
with formulating legal aid policy, about legal
aid systems in other countries. - Non-governmental legal aid centersFord Fdn
funding (as with Womens Center, above)
29Recourse against the State
- Administrative Litigation Law
- Petitioning