Title: Ethics in Qualitative Research
1Ethics in Qualitative Research
IUG
Presented by Dr. Wael Aldaya
2Workshop aims
IUG
- To raise the awareness of the ethical issues that
can arise in quantitative and qualitative
research. - To encourage researchers as well as the
universities to consider the ethical issues. - To enable researcher to deploy ethical theories,
guidelines and principles to solving ethical
dilemmas in business field.
3Road Map
IUG
- Research ethics.
- Ethical Philosophies.
- Potential for Ethical Issues in Qualitative
Research. - Ethical Philosophies concerns.
4Research ethics
IUG
- Research ethics relates to questions about how we
formulate and clarify our research topic, design
our research and gain access, collect data,
process and store our data, analyse data and
write up our research findings in a moral and
responsible way. - A code of ethics provide you with a statement of
principles and procedures for the conduct of your
research.
5Research ethics- In context
IUG
- In the context of ethics, the researcher has to
ask the following questions - What moral principles guide your research?
- How do ethical issues enter into your selection
of a research problem? - How do ethical issues affect how you conduct
your researchthe design of your study, your
sampling procedure, etc.? - What responsibility do you have toward your
research subjects
6II. Ethical Philosophies-Theories
IUG
- Four philosophical approaches are applied in
research - Deontological According to Skinner et al,.
(1988), deontological philosophies focus on the
factors or means used to arrive at an ethical
decision. It also means that you should not harm
participants in any way, no matter what the
potential benefit. - Teleological This approach emphasizes the
consequences that result from an action. Thus,
the potential harm from the research is
outweighed by the potential benefit of the
research.
7Ethical Theories, cont,,,
IUG
- Utilitarian ethics the theory that claims that
the only legitimate principle upon which to judge
an action as ethical is that it has beneficial
consequences, namely, that it reduces harms and
promotes the greatest happiness of the greatest
number e.g John S Mill. - Virtue ethics the theory that ethical conduct
should be directed by ideals of the virtues
higher than conformity to standards set by duty
and law.
8III. Potential for Ethical Issuesin Qualitative
Research
IUG
- Related to the stage of research
- Research Design (RD)
- Research Problem Statement (RPS)
- Formulating the research questions (RQ)
- Preparing Literature Review (LR)
- Collecting data data collection processes
- Writing Up (W-up)
- Discuss the results and reporting
9Ethical issues- RD
IUG
- Can the research be done properly with the
resources that are available? - Is there sufficient time for the design of the
research, collection of data and analysis of
results? - Will the available resources cover the costs of
the research (e.g. travel, printing, etc.)? - Will it be possible and practical to gain access
to necessary data (people, events, documents)?
10Research Design-cont,,,
IUG
- Researchers should be committed to discovering
and reporting things as faithfully and as
honestly as possible, without allowing their
investigations to be influenced by considerations
other than what is the truth of the matter.
11Ethical issues- RPS
IUG
- The researcher identifies a significant problem
or issue to study and presents a rational for its
importance. - It is important to identify a problem that will
benefit individuals being studied or
institutions. - Deception occurs when participants understand one
purpose for a study but the researcher has a
different purpose in mid. - It is also important for researchers to specify
the sponsorship of their study.
12Ethical issues- -RQ
IUG
- Ethical issues may intervene in forming up your
RQ - The ideological position of the researcher
- The political economic context in which the
research is taken up - The various stakeholders agenda including the
funding agencies, the researchers, the government
as a player, the global situation.
13Ethical issues- LR
IUG
- Ignoring the key authors
- Ignoring the key articles or journals
- Ignoring the key theories
- Obtaining a secondary citation for ones own
publication - The text is not cited by the mentioned reference
- Change the meaning of the text that you cited
- Excessively using one single reference
14Ethical issues- Data collection
IUG
- Collecting data without appropriate controls.
- No permission from the gatekeeper.
- Omitting controls that others have pointed out.
- Using inappropriate sample sizes.
- Using inappropriate research community.
- Selecting what to observe and ignores other
factors. - Failing to see events or seeing non-existing
ones. - Failing to preserve data for a sufficiently long
time. - Using out dated data. You are in 2014 not 2004.
15Ethical issues- Processing Data
IUG
- Manipulate and making up data.
- Using inappropriate statistical tests.
- Violating the statistical assumptions.
- Reporting only positive or significant results.
- Ignoring the opposite results.
16Ethical issues- W-up
IUG
- Using other peoples words (plagiarism).
- Cut and paste others work to form new ideas.
- Ignoring the contradictory findings.
- Not explaining why your findings differ from
others. - Failing to submit oneself to review or obtaining
permission from authors. - Changing the hypothesis.
- Reporting the significant correlation.
17Ethical issues- W-up, cont,,,
IUG
- Academic Fraud
- Academic fraud involves the intentional
misrepresentation of what has been done which is
worse than plagiarism. - Making up data and or result as he/she may have
difficulty accessing the correct people to
survey. - Purposefully putting forward conclusions that are
not accurate. You already have the conclusion.
18Ethical issues- W-up, cont,,,
IUG
- Misrepresenting the Results
- Misrepresenting (fabricate) the results, is
especially important for students undertaking
their project for a client. - On occasion, some students (not you, of course)
may purposefully misrepresent their work to
impress their business client. - Academic supervisors, on the other hand, will
frequently identify these exaggerations and mark
the work down accordingly.
19IV. Ethical Philosophies concerns
IUG
- There are six broad ethical areas that need to be
considered in your research - voluntary participation
- Informed consent
- confidentiality and anonymity
- the potential for harm
- Communicating the results
- more specific ethical issues
20Voluntary Participation
IUG
- The principle of voluntary participation requires
that people not be coerced into participating in
research. - Closely related to the notion of voluntary
participation is the requirement of informed
consent.
21Informed Consent
IUG
- Informed consent means that the participants
have - Adequate understandable Information about the
research. - fully informed about the procedures and risks
involved in research. - Are free to participate or not without any
coercion power. - Ethical standards also require that researchers
not put participants in a situation where they
might be at risk of harm .
22Informed Consent, cont,,,
IUG
- Must give their consent to participate.
- Have a free power to take their decision at any
time of the involvement (Frankfort and Naichimas,
1996). - Discussion of confidentiality and Anonymity are
part of the informed consent process.
23Potential for Harm
IUG
- Potential harm includes Psychological harm,
Financial harm and Social harm. - Ideally, your research should have minimal, if
any, potential for any harm to occur. - The question is not whether you believe harm
could occur, but whether participants or
potential participants believe that harm could
occur.
24Anonymity
IUG
- Anonymity requires that you do not know who the
participants are. (Oliver, 2003) - Advantages of applying anonymity
- Encourages objectivity throughout the research
process - Anonymity makes it easier to explore issues which
might be slightly unpopular (sensitive). - Using fictional names which protects
participants. - Random phone surveying.
25Confidentiality
IUG
- Researchers are assured that identifying
information will not be made available to anyone
who is not directly involved in the study. - Therefore, participant identity will not be
revealed in any way in the resulting report which
aims to protect the privacy of respondent. - It should be an explicit statement about the
people who will have access to the data provided
by a particular respondent. - The respondent should be informed about the plans
for retaining the data
26Confidentiality public company
IUG
- Organizations, just as much as individuals, may
be participants in research projects. - For public company, there should generally be an
expectation that researchers should receive as
much help and assistance as possible,
commensurate with the protection of named
individuals. - In the case of private companies they may have
both moral and legal rights to keep details
inaccessible.
27Differences in the research context
IUG
- Cultural differences
- The differences, both between participants
themselves, and between participants and the
researcher, may involve dimensions such as values
and attitudes, social customs, religious beliefs,
ethnicity, gender, language, employment patterns
and education.
28Differences in the research context
IUG
- Gender
- Females in some roles in education may prefer
certain types of inquiry methods to others. - Males, on the other hand, may be satisfied to
provide data in a more focused, less reflective
form.
29The social ecology
IUG
- The social ecology of a setting refers to the
sense of equilibrium which evolves between the
different social actors in that setting. - It is desirable that the researcher disturbs the
social ecology as little as possible. - The less the research field is disturbed by the
research process the better.
30Thanks for listening
IUG
- For further details you may contact the
researcher on the following e-mail - wdaya_at_iugaza.edu.ps
- dayawael_at_gmail.com
31Workshop References
IUG
- Paul Oliver, (2003) The Students Guide to
Research Ethics, Open University Press - Also useful are
- Michael Davis, (1999) Ethics for the University,
Routledge - Hillary Coombes, (2001) Research Using IT,
Palgrave - Resnik, D. (1986) The Ethics of Science, Routledge
32Additional Texts
IUG
- Elliot, D. (ed.) ( 1997) Research Ethics A
Reader, University Press of New England - Penslar, R. (ed.) (1997) Research Ethics Cases
and Materials, Open University Press - Punch, M. (1986) The Politics and Ethics of
Fieldwork, Sage, London - Homan, R (1991) The Ethics of Social Research,
Longmans - May, T (1997) Social Research Issues, Methods
and Process, Open U P (Ch 3 Values and Ethics in
the Research Process) - House, E and K R (1999) Values in Evaluation and
Social Research, Sage - Bebau, M J (1995) Moral Reasoning in Scientific
Research. Cases for Teaching and Assessment,
Indiana University