?????? ?????? ?? ????? ? ???????? ????????: H-Index ? ?????? ?? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 76
About This Presentation
Title:

?????? ?????? ?? ????? ? ???????? ????????: H-Index ? ?????? ??

Description:

Title: H-Index Workshop Author: Payam Kabiri, MD. PhD. Last modified by: Payam Kabiri Created Date: 5/7/2003 1:40:24 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:13
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 77
Provided by: PayamKa4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ?????? ?????? ?? ????? ? ???????? ????????: H-Index ? ?????? ??


1
?????? ?????? ?? ????? ? ???????? ????????
H-Index ? ?????? ??
  • ?????? ?????????
  • ?????? ??????? ? ??????? ????? ??????? ????? ?
    ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????? ???? ????? ?????

2
?????? ?? ????? ? ???????? ???????? H-Index ?
?????? ??
  • Payam Kabiri, MD. PhD.
  • Epidemiologist
  • Tehran IsfahanUniversities of Medical Sciences

3
?????? ????? !
  • ?????????? ? ????????? ?????? ? ??????
  • ????? ????? ???????? ????????
  • ?????? ?? ?????????????? ???????
  • ????? ???? H-Index
  • ????? ? ????? H-Index
  • ??????? ?????? H-Index
  • ??? ????

4
Scientometrics (bibliometrics)
  • Scientometrics (bibliometrics) - The measurement
    of scientific output activity through statistics
    on academic publications
  • The scope of bibliometrics includes
  • all quantitative aspects and models of science
    communication, storage, dissemination and
    retrieval of scientific information.

5
????? ????????
  • ?? ???? ?? ??????? ???? ?? ?? ?? ????? ??? ??????
    ?? ?????? ???????? ????? ????? ??? ????
    ????????.
  • ??? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ??? ?? ????
    ?????????? ???.

6
Scientometrics
informetrics
bibliometrics
scientometrics
cybermetrics
webometrics
7
Bibliometric data used for..
  • Scientific output evaluation
  • Impact
  • Citations
  • History of science
  • Publication strategies
  • Science policy resource allocation
  • Collection management
  • Sociology of science
  • Information organization
  • Information management utilization

8
Links of bibliometrics with related research
fields and application services
Science policy
Scientific information
Research management
Librarianship
Services for
Research in
Economics
Sociology of science
History of science
Library and Information Science
Life sciences
Informetrics
Mathematics/Physics
Webometrics
9
Why do we evaluate scientific output
International
  • Grant Allocations
  • Policy Decisions
  • Benchmarking
  • Promotion
  • Collection management
  • Funding allocations
  • Research

National
Institutional
Faculty
SPLIT IN NEEDS
SPLIT IN NEEDS
Researchers
10
Scientists Ranking Methods
  • Evaluation of scientists by experts
  • e.g., surveys
  • Citation Analysis
  • Task Compute a score for the objects
  • Hybrid method of previous two

11
3 Kinds of Citation Data Indexes
  • Articles
  • Citation Impact
  • Authors
  • Number of papers (Quantity)
  • Number of Citations (Quality)
  • Average number of citations/article
  • h-index g-index (Quantity Quality Both)
  • Journals
  • Journal Impact Factor
  • h-index

12
(No Transcript)
13
A Sample of a Sceintometery Report
14
3 Kinds of Citation Data
  • Articles
  • Citation Impact
  • Authors
  • Number of papers (Quantity)
  • Number of Citations (Quality)
  • Average number of citations/article
  • h-index g-index Quantity Quality Both)
  • Journals
  • Journal Impact Factor
  • h-index

15
ISI Impact Factor
A total cites in 1992 B 1992 cites to articles
published in 1990-91 (this is a subset of A) C
number of articles published in 1990-91D B/C
1992 impact factor
16
Citation Databases
  • Web of Science
  • Scopus
  • Google Scholar

17
Other Tools Available
  • Other bibliometric indicators
  • Journal Citation Reports (JCR)
  • Other indicators databases (national, essential,
    university, institutional)
  • ISIHighlyCited.com

18
WoS and Scopus Subject Coverage ( of total
records)
WoS SCOPUS
Google Scholar ?
19
Web of Science
  • Covers around 9,000 journal titles and 200 book
    series divided between SCI, SSCI and AHCI.
  • Electronic back files available to 1900 for SCI
    and mid- 50s for SSCI and mid-70s for AHCI.
  • Very good coverage of sciences patchy on
    softer sciences, social sciences and arts and
    humanities.
  • US and English-language biased.
  • Full coverage of citations.
  • Name disambiguation tool.
  • Limited downloading options.

20
Scopus
  • Positioning itself as an alternative to ISI
  • More journals from smaller publishers and open
    access (15,000 journals 750 conf proceedings)
  • Source data back to 1960.
  • Excellent for physical and biological sciences
    poor for social sciences does not cover
    humanities or arts.
  • Better international coverage (60 of titles are
    non-US)
  • Back to 1996 ! (e.g. citation data for the last
    decade only)
  • Not cover to cover and not up to date
  • Easy to use in searching for source publications
    clumsy in searching cited publications.
  • Citation tracker works up to 1000 records only.
  • Limited downloading options.

21
Google Scholar
  • Better coverage for all citations as it retrieve
    web !
  • More coverage of references also gray literature
    !
  • Coverage and scope?
  • Inclusion criteria?
  • Very limited search options
  • No separate cited author search
  • Back to 1990 NOT more !
  • Free!

22
What is Scopus Database?
  • ????? ???? ????????   (Scopus (Database
  • ???? ???????? ??? ?? 15200 ????? ????
  • ?????????? ??? ?? 30 ?????? ????? ????? ?? 4000
    ???? ???? ??????????
  • ?????????? ??? ?? 265 ?????? Citation
  • ?????????? ????? ????? ????? ??? ?? ??????

23
What is Scopus?
  • 15,200 titles from more than 4,000 publishers
  • 1,000 Open Access journals
  • 500 Conference Proceedings
  • 400M web pages
  • 21M patents
  • Repositories
  • Digital Archives

24
Content Update
  • 30 million records, of which
  • 15 million records include references going back
    to 1996
  • 15 million pre-1996 records go back as far as
    1900
  • 265 million references, added to records from
    1996 onwards
  • In addition to traditional scientific and
    academic journals, Scopus covers
  • 1000 Open Access journals
  • 500 Conference Proceedings
  • 600 Trade Publications
  • 125 Book Series
  • Medline (100 coverage)
  • 275 million quality web sites including 21
    million patents from 5 patent offices
  • UK Patents added to Scirus

25
What is Scopus?
240 million scholarly Web items, E-prints,
theses, dissertations, 13 M patents
  • 15 Elsevier sources
  • 85 other publishers

Fastest route to FullText
26
Valuable archive included
1966
Abstract30 million 1.1 million per year Cited
References 265 million 10 years 25 million each
year Currency Updated daily
1996
2006
15,100 current journal sources
27
Scopus Coverage15,100 Unique titles
Life Health (100 Medline)
Chemistry Physics Engineering
Biological Agricultural Environmental
Social Sciences Psychology Economics
28
International distribution of titles
806
29
Geographical spread of Scopus content
30
Iranian Titles indexed in Scopus
















Iranian Biomedical Journal
Archives of Iranian Medicine
Daru
Iranian Journal of Diabetes and Lipid Disorders
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
Iranian Journal of Public Health
Journal of Medicinal Plants
Yakhteh

31
Bibliometric Tool Development of Scopus
IMPLEMENT
Launch Scopus
  • Citation Tracker
  • Author Identifier
  • WebCites
  • PatentCites
  • h-index
  • Custom Data
  • End 2007 release

2006
2007
2005
2004
STRATEGY
32
Difficulties of Old Criteria
  • Total number of papers (Quantity)
  • Total number of citations (Quality)
  • Average number of citations/article (Deepened on
    the outliers)
  • Journal Impact Factor (Discipline based,
    dependent on the outliers)

33
H-index was born !
  • We need an Index both to include quantity also
    quality of an authors' paper
  • Productivity
  • Impact
  • Not affected by big hits
  • Not affected by noise

34
The h-index
  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an
    individual's scientific research output.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    of the United States of America, 102(46),
    16569-16572.
  • Meaningful when compared to others within the
    same discipline area. Researchers in one field
    may have very different h-indices than
    researchers in another (e.g. Life Sciences vs.
    Physics).

35
The h-index
  • Hirsch, J.E. "an index to quantify an
    individual's scientific research output".
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    of the United States of America (PNAS). 102(46),
    16569-16572
  • Available at http//arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0508025

36
The H-index a definition
  • The H-index is the highest number of papers a
    scientist has that have at least that number of
    citations. Nature (2005)

37
What is the h-Index?
  • Performance measurement tool for scientific
    authors (similar idea to journal impact factors
    but for individuals)Established by Jorge Hirsch
    at UC San Diego
  • A scientist has index h if h of his/her Np
    papers have at least h citations each, and the
    other (Np- h) papers have no more than h
    citations each.
  • Source Hirsch, J. E. (2005, September 29). An
    index to quantify an individuals scientific
    research output. Retrieved from
    http//arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508025

38
The h-index
  • DefinitionA researcher has h-index h if
  • h of his Np articles have received at least h
    citations each
  • the rest Np-h articles have received no more than
    h citations each

39
H-index Concept through its Graph
40
The h - Graph
41
The h-index
  • ???? ????? ?? ???????? ???????? ???. ??? ???? ??
    ??? 2005 ?????? ???? Jorge Hirsch ?? ???????
    ????????? ????? ??. ??? ???? ?? ???? ?? ???
    ??????? ???? ??? ? ??????? ??? ???????? ??????
    ?????? ????? ??? ???.

42
The h-index
  • ????? H-Index ????? ??? ?? ????? ?????? ???????
    ?? ????? ??????? ????? ?? h ? ?? ???? ?? ??
    ?????. ???? ??????? H-Index ????? 5 ????? ?????
    ?? ??? ??? ?? ??? ???? 5 ????? ????? ??? ???? ??
    ?????? ????? 5 ?????? ?? Citation ?????. ??
    ????? ???? ????? ?? ??? ??? ?? ???? ?????? ???
    ???? ???? ?? 5 ?????? ?????.
  • ?????? ??? ???? ????? Impact Factor ???? ??????
    ????? ??????.

43
The highest h-index in the World Iran
  • ???????? ???? h ?? ???? ????? ?? ???? ???? ?????
    ????? ?? 197 ? ???????? ???? h ?????? ????? ????
    ???? ???? ???? ??? ????? ???? ??????? ????
    ???????? ?? ??? h ????? 33 ?? ????.

44
Terminology
  • Np total number of papers
  • Nc,tot total number of citations
  • Y(now) present year
  • Y(i) year of publication of paper i
  • C(i) set of citations to paper i

45
The h-index
  • A scientist has index h if h of his or
    her Np papers have at least h citations each
    and the other ( Np h ) have at least h
    citations each

Doc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Cit 49 23 15 14 6 3 1 1 0 0 0
46
H-index example
  • Author A
  • Author B

Doc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Cit 55 45 20 10 5 4 3 2 1
Doc 1 2 3 4
Cit 25 20 9 6
47
H-index example
  • Author X has 5 published articles
  • Article1, citations 5
  • Article2, citations 10
  • Article3, citations 100
  • Article4, citations 6
  • Article5, citations 4
  • The H-index of X is 4 there are 4 papers with at
    least 4 citations each.

48
The h-index
  • It could be used for an specific Author
  • Evaluate the Research Performance of Author
  • Or could be used for a group of Papers of an
    institution, department or journal which
  • Evaluate the Impact of the group of special papers

49
H-index drawbacks
  • Like impact factors depends on subject area
  • It is a growing function over time
  • It does NOT show the current activity or
    inactivity of the author
  • Disadvantages younger researchers (without
    previous track record)
  • Scientists with short scientific life are out of
    competition

50
The Contemporary h-index
  • The Contemporary h-index was proposed by Antonis
    Sidiropoulos, Dimitrios Katsaros, and Yannis
    Manolopoulos
  • It adds an age-related weighting to each cited
    article, giving less weight to older articles.

51
The g-index
  • The g-index was proposed by Leo Egghe It is
    defined as follows
  • Given a set of articles ranked in decreasing
    order of the number of citations that they
    received, the g-index is the (unique) largest
    number such that the top g articles received
    (together) at least g2 citations.
  • It aims to improve on the h-index by giving more
    weight to highly-cited articles.

52
The g-index
  • Suggested in 2006 by Leo Egghe.
  • The index is calculated based on the distribution
    of citations received by a given researcher's
    publications.

53
The g-index
  • Given a set of articles ranked in decreasing
    order of the number of citations that they
    received, the g-index is the (unique) largest
    number such that the top g articles received
    (together) at least g2 citations
  • This index is very similar to the h-index, and
    attempts to address its shortcomings.

54
The h-b-index
  • The h-b-index developed by Michael Banks of the
    Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research in
    Germany, takes the index further by evaluating
    the impact of compounds used in solid-state
    physics and scientific topics in general.
  • The h-b-index is defined in the same manner as
    the h-index, but is based on a topic (or
    compound) search instead of a scientists name.

55
The h-b-index
  • A scientist has index h if h of his/her Np papers
    have at least h citations each, and the other (Np
    h) papers have at most h citations each.
  • For the case of a topic it is useful to define
    the h-b index in terms of the number of years, n
    as h nm
  • If the h-b index is linear with the number of
    years, then m is given as the gradient. In this
    respect, a compound or topic with a large m and
    h-b index can be defined as a hot topic.

56
The H-Graphs in Scopus
  • A more comprehensive way evaluating an author
  • Using Author Search, Scopus give us three
    different graphs
  • H-Index Graph of given Author
  • No of Author Papers (Articles) per year
  • No of Author Citations per year

57
No of articles
No of citations
h-index plot
58
The h-index
  • Plots citations per article
  • Incision h-index
  • Shows low highly cited-by counts
  • Completely transparent
  • The date range can change

Practical Interpretation Promotion, Evaluation,
Funding, Tenure, Benchmarking
59
Author articles history
  • Shows level of activity
  • Shows peaks and troths in publication history
  • Can change the date range

Practical Interpretation Promotion, Evaluation,
Funding, Tenure, Benchmarking
60
Author Cited-bys
  • Shows level of activity
  • Shows highs lows
  • Can change the date range
  • Time lag!

Practical Interpretation Promotion, Evaluation,
Funding, Tenure, Benchmarking
61
How to calculate h-index through Scopus
  • There is two way to calculate it according to the
    way you want
  • If you want it for an Author
  • Search the Author, It will calculate it
    Automatically for you.
  • If you want it for a group of Papers
  • Search them then use the track citation sort
    them out to count calculate it Manually.

62
The Hirsch IndexFor a Group of Papers
  • Run an author search
  • Sort result by citations, clicking on Cited by
  • Scroll down the new display of results until the
    ranking number is equal or less than the number
    of citations.
  • That ranking number is the Hirsch Index for that
    author.

63
Author Identifier functionality
  • Author Identifier enables Scopus users to avoid
    two major problems which affect most AI
    databases
  • How to distinguish between an authors articles
    and those of another author sharing the same
    name?
  • How to group an authors articles together when
    his or her name has been recorded in different
    ways?
  • With other databases, these problems can result
    in retrieving incomplete or inaccurate results.

64
Calculating the H-indexFor a Group of Papers
65
Indicators of quality as measured using published
outputs
  • Number of publications
  • Citation counts to these publications (adjusted
    for self-citations) -what window should be
    used? 4, 5, 10 years?
  • Citations per publication
  • Percentage of uncited papers
  • Impact factors (of publishing journals)
  • Diffusion factor (of citing journals) profile
    of users of research (who, where, when and what)
  • Impact factor of a scholar - Hirsh index (h
    index)
  • (numbers of papers with this number of
    citations).
  • Your h index 75 if you wrote at least 75 papers
    with 75 citations each.
  • Note These should not be seen as absolute
    numbers but always seen in the context of the
    discipline, research type, institution profile,
    seniority of a researcher, etc.

66
Calculating h-index using Thomson ISI Web of
Science
  1. Conduct a General Search
  2. Automatic click on Citation Report, or,
  3. Manual sort by Times Cited

67
Calculating h-index using Google Scholar
  • There are different ways to do it also
    different interfaces
  • 1- Publish or Perish Interface
  • You can download it here.
  • 2- Another Script, Click here.
  • 3- Also this one.

68
Compare like with like!
  • Applied research attracts fewer citations than
    basic research.
  • Differences in citation behaviour between
    disciplines (e.g. papers in organisational
    behaviour attract 5 times as many citations as
    papers in accounting).
  • Highest IF journal in immunology is Ann Rev Immun
    (IF 47.3) Mean for cat. 4.02 and in health care
    and services category is Milbank Q. (IF of 3.8).
    Mean for cat. 1.09.
  • Matthew effect.
  • Benchmarking must be done using comparable
    variables!
























69
Harzings Publish or Perish
  • A software program that retrieves and analyzes
    academic citations. It uses Google Scholar to
    obtain the raw citations, then analyzes these and
    calculates a series of citation metrics.

70
H-Index Advantages
  • The h-index was intended to address the main
    disadvantages of other bibliometric indicators,
    such as total number of papers or total number of
    citations.
  • It simultaneously measure the quality and
    sustainability of scientific output, as well as,
    to some extent, the diversity of scientific
    research.

71
H-Index Advantages
  • The h-index is much less affected by
    methodological papers proposing successful new
    techniques, methods or approximations, which can
    be extremely highly cited. For example, one of
    the most cited condensed matter theorists, John
    P. Perdew, has been very successful in devising
    new approximations within the widely used density
    functional theory. He has published 3 papers
    cited more than 5000 times and 2 cited more than
    4000 times. Several thousand papers utilizing the
    density functional theory are published every
    year, most of them citing at least one paper of
    J.P. Perdew. His total citation index is close to
    39 000, while his h-index is large, 51, but not
    unique. In contrast, the condensed-matter
    theorist with the highest h-index (94), Marvin L.
    Cohen, has a lower citation index of 35 000. One
    can argue that in this case the h-index reflects
    the broader impact of Cohen's paper in
    solid-state physics due to his larger number of
    highly-cited papers.

72
H-Index Problems
  • The h-index is bounded by the total number of
    publications. This means that scientists with a
    short career are at an inherent disadvantage,
    regardless of the importance of their
    discoveries. For example, Évariste Galois'
    h-index is 2, and will remain so forever. Had
    Albert Einstein died in early 1906, his h-index
    would be stuck at 4 or 5, despite his being
    widely acknowledged as one of the most important
    physicists, even considering only his
    publications to that date.
  • The h-index does not consider the context of
    citations. For example, citations in a paper are
    often made simply to flesh-out an introduction,
    otherwise having no other significance to the
    work. h also does not resolve other contextual
    instances citations made in a negative context
    and citations made to fraudulent or retracted
    work. (This is true for other metrics using
    citations, not just for the h-index.)
  • The h-index does not account for confounding
    factors. These include the practice of
    "gratuitous authorship", which is still common in
    some research cultures, the so-called Matthew
    effect, and the favorable citation bias
    associated with review articles.

73
H-Index Problems
  • The h-index has been found to have slightly less
    predictive accuracy and precision than the
    simpler measure of mean citations per paper.
  • While the h-index de-emphasizes singular
    successful publications in favor of sustained
    productivity, it may do so too strongly. Two
    scientists may have the same h-index, say, h
    30, but one has 20 papers that have been cited
    more than 1000 times and the other has none.
    Clearly scientific output of the former is more
    valuable.

74
H-Index Problems
  • The h-index is affected by limitations in
    citation data bases. Some automated searching
    processes find citations to papers going back
    many years, while others find only recent papers
    or citations. This issue is less important for
    those whose publication record started after
    automated indexing began around 1990. Citation
    data bases contain some citations that are not
    quite correct and therefore will not properly
    match to the correct paper or author.
  • The h-index does not account for the number of
    authors of a paper. If the impact of a paper is
    the number of citations it receives, it might be
    logical to divide that impact by the number of
    authors involved. (Some authors will have
    contributed more than others, but in the absence
    of information on contributions, the simplest
    assumption is to divide credit equally.) Not
    taking into account the number of authors could
    allow gaming the h-index and other similar
    indices for example, two equally capable
    researchers could agree to share authorship on
    all their papers, thus increasing each of their
    h-indices. Even in the absence of such explicit
    gaming, the h-index and similar indices tend to
    favor fields with larger groups, e.g.
    experimental over theoretical.

75
(No Transcript)
76
????? ! Email ??? ??? ??????
  • payam.kabiri_at_gmail.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com