Title: IMPLEMENTING STRATEGY: BUILDING RESOURCE CAPABILITIES AND STRUCTURING THE ORGANISATION
1- IMPLEMENTING STRATEGY BUILDING RESOURCE
CAPABILITIES AND STRUCTURING THE ORGANISATION
2 - Unless you have a trained, literate, motivated
work force, and give them decision-making
authority, you dont get satisfied customers. - Anthony Rucci
- Chief
Administrative Officer - Sears Roebuck
3The Task of Implementing Strategy
- An action-oriented, operations-driven activity
revolving around managing people and business
processes - Tougher and more time-consuming than crafting
strategy - Success depends on doing a good job of
- Leading
- Motivating
- Working with others to create fits between
strategy and how organisation does things
4Why Implementing Strategy Isa Tough
Management Job
- The demanding variety of managerial activities
that have to be performed - Numerous ways to tackle each activity
- People management skills required
- Perseverance to launch a variety of initiatives
- Number of bedeviling issues to be worked out
- Battling resistance to change
- Difficulties of integrating efforts of work
groups into a smoothly-functioning whole
5Why Implementing Strategy Isa Tough
Management Job
- Implementing a new strategy takes adept
leadership to - Overcome pockets of doubt
- Build consensus
- Secure commitment of concerned parties
- Get all implementation pieces in place and
coordinated
6Characteristics of the Strategy Implementation
Process
- Every manager has an active role
- No 10-step checklists
- Few concrete guidelines
- Least charted, most open-ended part of strategy
management - Cuts across many aspects ofhow to manage
7Characteristics of the Strategy Implementation
Process (cont.)
- Each implementation situation occurs in a
different context, affected by differing - Business practices and competitive situations
- Work environments and cultures
- Policies
- Compensation incentives
- Mix of personalities and organisational histories
- Approach to implementation has be customised to
fit the situation - People implement strategies - Not companies!
8The Eight Components ofImplementing Strategy
Allocating Resources
Building a Capable Organisation
Establishing Strategy- Supportive Policies
Strategy Implementers Action Agenda
Instituting Best Practices for Continuous Improvem
ent
Exercising Strategic Leadership
Installing Support Systems to Carry out Strategic
Roles
Shaping Corporate Culture to Fit Strategy
Tying Rewards to Achievement of Key Strategic
Targets
9What Is the Goal ofStrategy Implementation?
- Unite total organisation behind strategy
- See that activities are done in a manner tightly
matching first-rate strategy execution - Generate commitment so an enthusiastic crusade
emerges to carry out strategy - Create a series of strategy-supportive fits
10Who Are theStrategy Implementers?
- Implementation involves the whole management team
- Every organisation unit and all employees have a
role and need to be committed - CEO, other senior executives and heads of major
organisational units must lead the process and
orchestrate major initiatives - But they must rely on middle and lower-level
managers to push things on the front line and see
that strategy is well-executed on a daily basis
11Ways to LeadImplementation Process
- Take active, visible role or low-key, behind the
scenes role - Make decisions authoritatively or based on
consensus - Delegate much or little
- Be personally involved in details or coach others
to carry day-to-day burden - Proceed swiftly to achieve results or move
deliberately, content with gradual progress
12Factors Influencing Managers in Leading
Implementation Process
- Experience and knowledge of business
- New to job or seasoned
- Network of personal relationships
- Diagnostic, administrative, interpersonal, and
problem-solving skills - Authority given manager
- Leadership style most comfortable with
- View of role to get things done
- Context of organisations situation
13Task 1 Building aCapable Organisation
Select able people
for key positions
Develop skills, core competencies, managerial
talents, competitive capabilities
Organise business processes, value chain
activities, and decision-making to promote
successful strategy execution
14Selecting People for Key Positions
Implementation Issues
- Type of core management team needed to carry out
strategy - Find the right people to fill each slot
- Existing management team may be suitable
- Core executive group may need strengthening
- Promote from within
- Bring in skilled outsiders
15Selecting People for Key Positions Key
Considerations
- Determine mix of
- Backgrounds
- Experiences and know-how
- Beliefs and values
- Styles of managing and personalities
- Personal chemistry must be right
- Talent base needs to be appropriate
- Picking a solid management team needs to be acted
on early in implementation process
16Key Organisation-Building Objectives
- Staff organisational units with the specialised
talents, skills, and technical expertise needed
to develop and build core competencies - Build competitively valuable organisational
capabilities
17Strategic Management Principle
- Building core competencies, resource strengths,
and organisational capabilities that rivals cant
match is a sound foundation for sustainable
competitive advantage !
18Power of Unique Competencies and Capabilities
When it is difficult to outstrategise rivals with
a superior strategy . . .
. . . Best avenue to industry leadership is to
out-compete rivals with superior strategy
execution!
Building competencies and capabilities rivals
cant match is one of the best ways to
out-compete them!
19Strategically-RelevantCore or Distinctive
Competencies
- Greater proficiency in product development
- Better manufacturing know-how
- Capability to provide better after-sale service
- Faster response to changing customer needs
- Superior cost-cutting skills
- Capacity to speed new products to market
- Superior inventory management systems
- Better marketing and merchandising skills
- Specialised depth in unique technologies
- Greater effectiveness in promoting
union-management cooperation
20Example Intels Core Competence
Design of complex chips for personal computers
21Example Sonys Core Competence
- Expertise in electronic technology and ability to
translate the expertise into innovative products
- Miniaturised radios and video cameras TVs and
VCRs with unique features attractively designed
PCs
22Building Core Competencies The Necessary
Understanding
- 1. Core competencies are rarely grounded in
skills or know-how of a single department - Typically emerge from collaborative efforts of
different work groups - 2. Leveraging competencies into competitive
advantage requires concentrating more effort and
more talent than rivals on strengthening
competencies and creating valuable organisational
capabilities - 3. Sustaining competitive advantage requires
adapting competencies to new conditions
23Building Competitively Valuable Competencies
and Capabilities
- Involves
- Managing human skills, knowledge bases, and
intellect - Coordinating efforts of related work groups
- Collaborative networking among internal groups
and with external partners - Achieving dominating depth
- Senior managers have to guide the process
- The Ongoing Challenge Broaden, deepen, or modify
competencies and capabilities in response to
customer/market changes
24Strategic Management Principle
- Building core competencies, resource strengths,
and organisational capabilities that rivals
cant match is a sound basis for sustainable
competitive advantage.
25Building Competencies and Capabilities The
Keys to Success
- Superior selection
- Training
- Cultural influences
- Cooperative networking
- Motivation
- Empowerment
- Attractive incentives
- Organizational flexibility
- Short deadlines
- Good databases
26The Most Valuable Organisational Capabilities
- Contribute heavily to better strategy execution
- Provide a differentiating factorthat customers
can see and that customers value - Are hard for rivals to match
- Time consuming to build
- Hard to replicate or imitate
- Difficult to obtain from others
27Strategy and Organisation Structure
- Few hard and fast rules for organising
- Main rule Structure must support and facilitate
good strategy execution - Each firms organisation structure is
idiosyncratic, reflecting - Prior arrangements, internal politics
- Executive judgments and preferences about how to
arrange reporting relationships
28Strategic Management Principle
Attempting to carry out a new strategy with an
old organisational structure is usually unwise!
29Matching Organisation Structure to Strategy
The Steps to Take
- 1. Pinpoint critical activities and capabilities
- 2. Decide which activities to outsource
- 3. Decide which activities require partners
- 4. Make primary, internally-performed activities
the main building blocks - 5. Determine degree of authority to delegate
- 6. Establish ways to achieve coordination
- 7. Assign responsibility for managing
relationships with outsiders
30Step 1 Pinpointing Strategy-Critical
Activities
- Which activities are strategy-critical depends
on - Particulars of a firms strategy
- Value-chain make-up
- Competitive requirements
- Identify strategy-critical activities
- 1. What functions have to be performed extra well
and on time to produce strategic success and gain
competitive advantage? - 2. In what value-chain activities would poor work
performance endanger success?
31Step 2 Looking for Outsourcing Opportunities
- Potential advantages of outsourcing
- Decrease internal bureaucracies
- Flatten organisation structure
- Provide firm with heightened strategic focus
- Increase competitive responsiveness
- Makes strategic sense when outsiders can perform
certain activities - At a lower cost and/or
- With higher value-added
32Step 3 Deciding Which Activities Require
Partners
- The advantages partnering may offer
- Speed new technology/products to market
- Quicker delivery or lower inventories of parts
- Help provide better/faster technical assistance
to customers via - Geographically wider distribution
- Economical custom manufacture
- More extensive after-sale support services
- Partnering makes strategic sense when result is
to enhance organisational capabilities
33Step 4 Making Strategy-Critical Activities
the Main Building Blocks
- Assign managers of strategy-critical activities a
visible, influential position - Avoid fragmenting responsibility for
strategy-critical activities across many
departments - Provide coordinating linkages between related
work groups - Meld into a valuable competitive capability
34Strategic Management Principle
Matching structure to strategy requires making
strategy-critical activities and organisational
units the main building blocks in the
organisation structure!
35Guard Against OrganisationDesigns That
Fragment Activities
- Parceling critical work across specialised
departments contributes to many hand-offs which - Lengthens completion time
- Increases overhead costs
- Obsession with activity rather than result
- Solution Pull critical processes from
functional silos and create process-complete
departments - However, some fragmentation is often advantageous
for certain support activities
36Examples of Strategy-Critical Activities That
Are Often Fragmented
- Filling customer orders
- Customer service
- Obtaining feedback from customers
- New product development
- Improving product quality
- Managing relationships with key suppliers
- Building capability to conduct business via the
Internet
37Step 5 Determining How MuchAuthority to
Delegate to Whom
- Centralised structure
- Top managers retain authority for most decisions
- Decentralided structure
- Managers and employees are empowered to make
decisions - Trend
- Shift from authoritarian to decentralised
structures emphasising empowerment
38Advantages of Decentralised Decision-Making
and Empowerment
- Fewer management layers
- Less bureaucracy
- Shorter response times
- More creativity and new ideas
- Better motivation of employees
- Greater employee involvement
- Increased organisational capability
39The Global Trend Toward Decentralisation
Empowerment
- Three beliefs are driving company preferences for
flatter, more decentralised structures - 1. Traditional hierarchical structures based on
functional specialisation dont work well where
theres a big need for cross-functional
competitive capabilities - 2. Decisions are best made at the lowest
organisational level capable of making competent,
timely, informed decisions - 3. Empowering employees to exercise judgment on
job-related matters improves motivation and job
performance
40Step 6 Reporting Relationships and Cross-Unit
Coordination
- Classic method of coordinating activities is to
have related units report to single manager - Managers higher up in the pecking order have the
clout to coordinate and unify the efforts of the
units under their supervision - Support activities should be woven into the
structure in whatever ways that - Maximize performance of primary activities
- Contain costs of support activities
- Formal reporting relationships often need to be
supplemented
41Step 7 Assign Responsibility
forCollaboration With Outsiders
- Need multiple ties at multiple levels to ensure
- Communication
- Coordination and control
- Must find ways to produce collaborative efforts
that enhance capabilities and resource strengths - While forming alliances and collaborative
partnerships presents opportunities, nothing
valuable is realised until the relationship with
outsiders grows and develops into an engine for
better organisational performance
42Why Structure Follows Strategy
- Changes in strategy typically require a new
structure for implementation to be successful - Research indicates
- Structure affects performance
- Structure merits reassessment whenever strategy
changes - New strategy involves different skills and key
activities - How work is structured is a means to an end - not
an end in itself!
43Strategy-Driven Approachesto Organisational
Structure
- Functional and process specialisation
- Geographic organisation
- Decentralised business units
- Strategic business units
- Matrix structures
44A Traditional FunctionalOrganisational
Structure
General Manager
Research Development
Manufacturing
Human Resources
Engineering
Marketing
Finance Accounting
45A Process-Oriented Functional Structure
46GeographicOrganisational Structure
CEO
47A Decentralised Line-of-Business Organisation
Structure
48An SBU Organisation Structure
CEO
Corporate Services
Group VP SBU I
Group VP SBU II
Group VP SBU III
Strategically Related Business Units
Strategically Related Business Units
Strategically Related Business Units
49A Matrix Organisation Structure
50Options for Supplementing the Basic
Organisation Structure
- Cross-functional task forces
- Self-contained work teams
- Special project teams
- Venture team approach
- Process teams
- Contact managers
- Relationship managers
51Perspectives on Organising
- All the basic organisation structures have
strategic advantages and disadvantages - There is no ideal organisation design
- To do a good job of matching structure to
strategy - Pick a basic design
- Modify as needed
- Supplement with coordinating mechanisms and
communication arrangements
52When Do Traditional Hierarchical Structures
Make Strategic Sense?
- When activities can be divided into simple,
repeatable tasks and efficiently performed in
mass quantity - There are important benefits to deep functional
expertise - Customer needs are standardised
53Organisational Structures of the Future
Success Depends On . . .
- Quick response to shifting customer preferences
- Short design-to-market cycles
- First-time quality
- Custom order and multi-version production
- Expedited delivery and accurate order filling
- Personalised customer service
- Rapid assimilation of new technologies
- Creativity and innovativeness
- Speedy reaction to competitive developments
54 Organisational Structures of the Future
Meeting the New Requirements
- Decentralised structures with fewer managers
- Small-scale business units
- Reengineering to decrease fragmentation
- Development of stronger and newer capabilities
- Collaborative partnerships with outsiders
- Empowerment and self-directed work teams
- Lean staffing of corporate support functions
- Open communications via e-mail
- Electronic information systems
- Accountability for results
55(No Transcript)