Title: Comparative analysis of various international workplace violence approaches and programmes.
1- Comparative analysis of various international
workplace violence approaches and programmes. - Excellante - Workplace Trauma Solutions
Conference - March 2004
- Gary Watkins
- Workinfo.com www.workinfo.com
2What behaviours are deemed to constitute
workplace violence
- European Commission in Dublin in May 1995
- Incidents where persons are abused, threatened or
assaulted in circumstances related to their work,
involving an explicit or implicit challenge to
their safety, well-being and health. - Abuse Behaviours that depart from reasonable
conduct and involve the misuse of physical or
psychological strength. - Threats The menace of death, or the announcement
of an intention to harm a person or damage their
property. - Assault Any attempt at physical injury or attack
on a person including actual physical harm. Abuse
covers all forms of harassment, including sexual
and racial harassment, bullying and mobbing. - The above definition became a milestone for
definitions across Europe.
3The meaning of workplace violence
- There is growing recognition that "violence" goes
far beyond the reach of physical acts, to include
various forms of psychological violence. In
keeping with the terms of reference of the
International Labour Organization (ILO - 1998)
who conducted a sweeping survey of international
workplaces, "violence" is defined in this survey
as - "any incident in which a person is abused,
threatened or assaulted in circumstances relating
to their work. These behaviours would originate
from customers, co-workers at any level of the
organization. This definition would include all
forms of harassment, bullying, intimidation,
physical threats/assaults, robbery and other
intrusive behaviours"
4Physical and psychological violence
- WHO definition of violence (ILO/ICN/WHO/PSI,
2000) - Physical violence The use of physical force
against another person or group that results in
physical, sexual or psychological harm. - Psychological violence Intentional use of power
against another person or group that can result
in harm to physical, mental, spiritual, moral or
social development.
5- Focus on sequence of minor acts
- Focus on dignity
- The fusion of bullying and mobbing
6Terms used for physical violence
- those incidents which cause major
- injury, require medical assistance,
- require first aid only
- assault, assaultive incident
- murder (SWE)
- fatalities (OSHA)
- physical or sexual assault
- attack
- abusive behaviour (CAL/OSHA)
- threat ( verbal and non-verbal) threat of
- assaults threat of sexual nature
7Terms used for psychological violence
- threatening behaviour
- verbal abuse, verbal attack
- non-verbal abuse (stalking)
- bullying
- ganging up
- harassment (includes threatening letters,
- phone-calls (SWE, ACT))
- health and safety hazards, including fear
- intimidation
8A different typology
- Workplace violence can be separated into
different types according to the aggressor and
his/her relation to the affected work setting or
worker. - Californian OSHA. Three broad types of workplace
violence have been identified - TYPE I The aggressor has no legitimate
relationship to the workplace and the main
objective is to commit a robbery (cash, drugs) or
other criminal act. (External violence) - TYPE II The aggressor is the recipient or the
object of a service provided by the affected
workplace or the victim, e. g. a client, patient.
This may include also relatives or friends of the
clients. (Client initiated violence) - TYPE III The aggressor has an
employment-related involvement in the work
setting. Usually it is a another employee , a
co-worker, a supervisor, a boss , a student
(internal violence).
9What needs to be regulated - workplace violence
mitigation
- Basic Elements of a Workplace Violence Prevention
Plan - Employment Process (Kelleher, 1996)
- Pre-employment screening.
- Background checks.
- Termination process (Kelleher, 1996)
- Know how to conduct termination.
- Know when to conduct termination.
- Have an appropriate place to terminate.
- Have the appropriate people in attendance.
- Evaluate the work environment for stress causing
elements (Kelleher, 1996) - Address the problem towards a solution.
- Intervention Program (Kelleher, 1997)
- Counseling program.
- Crisis management team.
- Zero tolerance policy for violence.
- Open communications.
- Threat of violence reporting system. (Braverman,
1999)
10What needs to be regulated - workplace violence
mitigation
- Education and Training (supervisor/employees)
(Kelleher, 1996) - Know signs of trouble
- How to report threats
- New policies (supervisors).
- Conflict resolution.
- Improve interpersonal skills.
- New policies (employees)
- Security Measures (Kelleher, 1996)
- Evaluate current vulnerabilities
11Interactive model of workplace violence
12All professions treated the same?
13All professions treated the same?
14Special focus areas
- Public service sectors
- Catering and retail
- Health care and social services
- Education
- Health care and social services
15Comparison of approaches to workplace violence in
various jurisdictions
- Canada
- Labour Code
- Duties of Employers
- Every employer shall ensure that the health and
safety at work of every person employed by the
employer is protected. - - take the prescribed steps to prevent and
protect against violence in the work place
16USA
- Respondeat Superior Under this doctrine, an
employer may be held vicariously liable for the
tortious conduct of an employee who was acting
within the scope of his or her employment. The
key issue here is what conduct falls within the
"scope" of employment. - Negligent hiring An employer may be held liable
for the negligent or tortious conduct of an
employee if the employer is found to have
breached the duty to use reasonable care in the
screening and selection of paid and volunteer
staff, particularly with regard to the
elimination of those candidates whose backgrounds
evidence the foreseeable possibility of violent
or sexually abusive behaviors. - Negligent Entrustment An employer will most
commonly be hit with a negligent entrustment
action when an employee gets into an accident
while driving a business-owned automobile. To
prevail, the injured party must show that the
employer entrusted a company vehicle to a known
unfit driver and that the accident resulted from
the employee's incompetence. Whether the employee
involved was acting within the scope of
employment is not a concern in a negligent
entrustment case. The employer's negligent act of
entrustment, not the scope of employment, forms
the basis of the tort. - General Duty Clause
17European Foundation for the Improvement of Living
and Working Conditions, 2003
- The situation in Europe concerning the regulation
of workplace violence is extremely varied and
constantly changing. Within Europe, the spectrum
of regulatory options has been covered. - According to Di Martino (2002c and 2002d), these
different approaches to regulating and
controlling the problems of workplace violence
are a reflection of - different perceptions and interpretations of
workplace violence in European countries due to
different cultural influences - options available for tackling the increasing
challenge of workplace violence, for example,
using existing regulations or developing new
regulatory instruments and - different strategies as to the type of
instruments to be used, favouring the progressive
approach and flexibility of non-legislative ones
or tackling the problem with straightforward
legislation.
18South Africa
- Constitutional provisions against attacks on
persons dignity - General provisions against discrimination and
harassment in Bill of Rights, LRA, EEA (equality
legislations) - Code of Good Practice (equality legislation)
- Common law concept of vicarious liability for
acts of employee in course and scope of
employment - General duty clause (?)
- Voluntary self-regulation
- Disciplinary codes and regulations
- Negotiated agreements to prevent WV
- Criminal provisions
- Assault, rape, grievous bodily harm etc
19South Africa - course and scope of employment
"vicarious liability"
- Where a person is sought to be held liable for
the wrongful act of an alleged servant the
position has always been that it is for the
plaintiff to prove that the person who did the
wrong was (a) the servant of the party sought to
be held liable and (b) that he performed the
wrongful act in the course or scope of his
employment.
20- Innes JA stated that
- (a) plaintiff who seeks to make a master liable
for the negligent act of a servant must prove
that the servant was acting in the course of his
employment. That onus may conceivably be
discharged by inference from established facts
but it does not seem to me to be shifted by the
mere proof that the act was done at a time when
and a place where the servant was in his
masters employ.
21A general duty
- The Occupational Health and Safety Act (Act 181
of 1993) has a general duty clause which places a
general duty on employers to ensure the health
and safety of employees"General duties of
employers to their employees 8. (1) Every
employer shall provide and maintain, as far as is
reasonably practicable, a working environment
that is safe and without risk to the health of
his employees. "The Act then provides for
specific employer duties. These specific duties
do not derogate from the generality of an
employer's duties.
22Conclusion
- What is workplace violence? - definitions
- What should a workplace violence programme
regulate? - Should all professions be treated the same?
- How do different jurisdictions address workplace
violence? - What laws would be applicable in SA?
- A single code of conduct, extension of OHSA
general duty clause or reliance on vicarious
responsibility