Title: GMDH%20Application%20for%20autonomous%20mobile%20robot
1GMDH Application for autonomous mobile robots
control system construction
- A.V. Tyryshkin, A.A. Andrakhanov, A.A. Orlov
- Tomsk State University of Control Systems and
Radioelectronics - E-mail rim1282_at_mail.ru
2Classification of existing autonomous robots
3Nearest analog agricultural AMR Lukas
4(No Transcript)
5Basic works on GMDH application to AMR control
- C.L. Philip Chen, A.D. McAulay
- Robot Kinematics Learning Computations Using
Polynomial Neural Networks, 1991 - C.L. Philip Chen, A.D. McAulay
- Robot Kinematics Computations Using GMDH
Learning Strategy, 1991 - F. Ahmed, C.L. Philip Chen
- An Efficient Obstacle Avoidance Scheme in Mobile
Robot Path Planning using Polynomial Neural
Networks, 1993 - C.L. Philip Chen, F. Ahmed
- Polynomial Neural Networks Based Mobile Robot
Path Planning, 1993 - A.F. Foka, P.E. Trahanias
- Predictive Autonomous Robot Navigation, 2002
- T. Kobayashi, K. Onji, J. Imae, G. Zhai
- Nonliner Control for Autonomous Underwater
Vehicles Using Group Method of Data Handling,
2007
6Part I Inductive approach to construction of AMR
control systems
7Problems of AMR design
- Navigation
- Obstacle Recognition
- Autonomous Energy Supply
- Optimal Final Elements Control
- Technical State Diagnostics
- Objectives Execution
- Knowledge Gathering and Adaptation
8Generalized structure of AMR
9Objective aspects of AMR control system
construction
- Utility
- Realizability
- Appropriateness
- Classification
- Taking into account Internal system parameters
- Forecasting
10Features of AMR obstacle recognition
- Lack of objects a priori information
- Objects to recognize are complex ill-conditioned
systems with fuzzy characteristics - Objects are characterized by high amount of
difficultly- measurable parameters
- It is necessary to take into account internal
systems parameters for objects classification
according to obstacle/not obstacle property,
i.e. it isnt possible to find out is this object
obstacle or not without regard for system state.
- There is no necessity to perform full object
identification, i.e. it isnt necessary to answer
a question What object is this?
11(No Transcript)
12Part IIAutonomous Cranberry Harvester
13Expected Engineering-and-economical Performance
- Nominal Average AMR speed
- Cranberry harvesting coverage
- Relative density of harvested cranberry
- Total weight of harvested cranberry per season
14Automated cranberry harvester
15Part IIISimulation Results
16Object Recognition Data Sample
- Learning samples 92 Training samples 50.
- Values Ranges
Object Length L ? 020 ? Object Width w ?
020 ? Object Height h ? 020 ?
17Recognizing Modified Polynomial Neural Network
18Objective Functions Data Sample
- Learning samples 140 Training samples 140.
- Values Ranges
- Surface density of cranberry distribution
?cranberry ? 01 kg/m2 - Cranberry harvesting efficiency ? ? 2075
- Average AMR speed Vaverage ? 07 km/h
- Nominal average AMR speed Vnomaverage ? 24
km/h - AMR engine fuel consumption per 100 km Pfuel ?
150600 liters/100 km. - Values laws of variation
19Objective Functions
Function of maximal cranberry harvest in preset
time
Function of maximal cranberry harvest in minimal
time
Function of maximal cranberry harvest with
minimal fuel consumption
20Main Indices of Simulation Data
1) Obstacle recognition criterion values
CR Percentage of Errors
0.055 12
2) Objective Functions criterion values
F(mcranberry,?t) F(mcranberry,?t) F(mcranberry,t) F(mcranberry,t) F(mcranberry, mfuel) F(mcranberry, mfuel)
CR BS CR BS CR BS
3.8e-4 9.8e-3 8.6e-3 0.9 1.8e-3 1.6
21Man should grant a maximal freedom to the
computing machinery. Like a horseman having lost
a way leave it to a discretion of his
horse...A.G. Ivakhnenko. Long-term
forecasting and complex system control, Publ.
????i??, Kiev, 1975. p. 8.
22Thank you for attention!
23?????????? ??????????? ???????? ? ????????????
?????????? ?????????????
24??????????? ????????? ?????????? ? ??????? ???
25???????????? ???????? ???? ? ??????????? ????????