Title: Feb. 20, 2007 Major Pratt Feb 22, 2007 Shoal Lake 7:00 pm
1Feb. 20, 2007 Major PrattFeb 22, 2007 Shoal
Lake700 pm
Park West School Division
Budget Presentation Meeting
2007-08 School Year
2Agenda
- Division Planning/Priorities
- Enrolment
- Staffing- School and Divisional
- Ongoing Initiatives/Programs
- Revenues
- Expenditures
- Special Levy Required
- Mill Rate
- Recap
- Challenges for 2007-08 budget
- Questions
3Demographic trendsA context for planning
- Like most rural school Divisions, Park West is
experiencing considerable declines in enrolment. - 1986 2754 students
- 1996 2450
- 2005 2110
- 2006 1904.5
- 2007 1782.5 (projected)
4Division Planning
The Board of Trustees held a strategic planning
retreat on October 28 and 29, 2005 to review the
divisions long-term priority areas. They
reorganized their priority areas into three
categories education, operations, and
governance. A decision was taken to conduct a
review of the divisions infrastructure,
transportation, maintenance, and custodial areas.
Mr. Bill Shaeffer implemented the review and
made a draft available to the board on March 1,
2006. This was discussed at a focus group meeting
in June 2006. Based on this meeting, the Board
has decided to have community meetings in the
spring of 2007 to discuss possible futures for
our Division. The Board also approved a new
school review policy which gives clear and
transparent information to communities on when
and why a school is put under review. For
instance, the threshold numbers for K to 8 is an
average of five students per grade, while grades
9 through 12 must have an average of 14
students.
5More Planning
- The Board, Senior Admin, and principals attended
a planning summit on Nov. 28 29, 2006. - Participants discussed the division priorities,
demographic trends, and fiscal challenges. - The fiscal challenges are related to loss of
students, program demands, aging infrastructure,
new technology, and priorities/mandates from
Manitoba Education.
6Multi year plans
- Further to the Division plan, detailed long-term
planning occurs in the following areas - Schools
- Operations (transportation and maintenance)
- Technology
- Student Services
7Park West School Division five-year priority areas
- EDUCATION
- Assessment
- Literacy
- Aboriginal education
- Arts education
- Vocational education
- Citizenship
- Alternative education
- OPERATION
- Transportation
- Maintenance
- Custodial
- Buildings
- Fiscal sustainability
- GOVERNANCE
- Evaluation of the Board
- Evaluation of the CEO
- Succession planning
- The evolving role of boards
8Provincial Budget
- In the past years Manitoba education has
increased the budget for school divisions by an
amount equal to the economic growth factor for
the province. - This growth factor was predicted to be about 2.8
for the 2007-2008 school year. - Initially, we did not feel we would get any
increase as our student population was decreasing
by the same amount or more.
9Provincial Budget (cont)
- A pleasant surprise was the injection of
increased 2 in grants for all school divisions. - This has resulted in an additional 102,000.00
for Park West. It must be spent in common
priority areas of both Manitoba education and our
school division. It cannot be used for ongoing
operational costs but rather onetime investments.
- It is the Boards intention to spend these funds
in the areas of arts education, vocational
programs, restructuring, science, and technology.
10Assessment for and of learning
- Recent professional development for teachers has
focused on the use of assessment to guide
individual and class instruction. - Elementary, middle, and senior years teacher
teams are working on implementing new Divisional
report cards. Most schools are piloting the new
report card. - Release time and professional development for
teachers in the area of assessment has been tied
to the provincial guaranteed grant increase of
2. - - 20 000. has been allocated for assessment
release time
11Literacy/Numeracy
- A halftime Curriculum Resource Teacher has been
hired to support elementary classrooms. This
position is entirely funded by categorical
provincial grants. - Staffing support for Reading Recovery has been
reduced to be consistent with provincial funding
levels and school demographics. - - The costs associated with Reading Recovery
will be reduced to the equivalent of a 0.9 fte
teacher.
12Arts education
- A Division-wide Kindergarten through Grade 6
music program was implemented in 2003-2004. - - This has been continued for 2006-2007 and
requires 2.1 FTE teachers. - Schools offering Band programs will receive an
increase in staffing of 0.25 fte. This
translates to a 0.75 fte increase across the
Division. - There will be a special grant 10,000.00 for the
purchase of materials related to music programs.
13Aboriginal Education
- We now have educational agreements with all four
of our First Nation partners. These agreements
include regular liaison committee meetings as
well as jointly funded home-school personnel. The
Aboriginal Academic Achievement provincial Grant
of 97000 in 2004- 2005 has been reduced to
42,000 in 2007- 2008. Most of this grant is used
to jointly fund the above personnel and meetings. - Federal government funding for education in First
Nation communities is designed to force these
communities to offer a complete Kindergarten
through Grade 12 program and not purchase outside
services. The reduced availability of high school
teachers and their frozen salary grid continues
to make this very challenging. Provincial school
jurisdictions faced different challenges when
trying to offer these services as our costs are
tied to 2007 salaries and not 1998. - We are working hard to ensure our schools and
classrooms provide a welcoming environment for
all students. The emphasis has been on caring
and inclusive values, assets framework
activities, and parental engagement.
14Vocational education
- Partnerships with the apprenticeship branch,
community colleges, and employers are expected to
increase the opportunities for dual credits and
future employment for graduates. - We have signed an agreement with Assiniboine
Community College for the fall of 2007. This
will have ACC housed at Major Pratt with options
available to all senior students in the Division. - Vocational education continues to be a challenge
across Park West School Division. Many of our
schools do not have appropriate facilities. - We presently coordinate evening options in
welding, small motor mechanics, and domestic
education. They provide additional options for
all students across the Division. - We will use a portion of the special 2
provincial grant to upgrade the home economics
facility at Major Pratt school. The bottom
cupboards the four kitchen areas have not been
upgraded in 35 years.
15Technology
- We are planning to establish a virtual local area
network to improve our communication and
technology infrastructure. This will assist with
delivering programs, professional development,
telephones, servicing, and reliability. - These plans call for a pilot installation in the
Birtle area. If this pilot is successful, the
network will be phased in across the Division
over the next three to five years. - - The cost will be approximately 125,000 per
year. - - The anticipated improvements in service once
the network is established are expected to
create savings of approximately 80,000 per
year. - - We would be very interested in partnering with
rural municipalities and others in this
initiative.
16Citizenship
- Our core initiative for this priority area will
be the Assets framework. A Division wide
in-service and a series of student summits were
held to review data from a recent student survey.
- Community committees, which will include student
and staff representatives, will work at building
and celebrating assets for all students. - This initiative is funded over a three-year
period with a yearly 45,000 special Grant - Over half of our teaching staff have been trained
in Restitution, a program intended to help
students take ownership and responsibility for
their own success.
17Operations transportation area
- An external consultant implemented a study in
March, which examined transportation issues
including costs, safety, flexibility, age of the
fleet, recruitment and other models with respect
to both division owned and contractor operated
buses. - Trustees have decided to maintain our present
arrangement which uses both Division and
contractor-owned buses. - Financial pressures from previous budgets have
meant that we have not kept pace with the
purchase of new buses. - - Trustees are budgeting for the purchase of two
new buses for this year to maintain an
appropriate average age for our fleet. This will
add an additional 200,000 to our budget.
18Operations - maintenance area
- The March review also examined the current costs,
number, and skills of employees in maintenance as
well as future needs. - We have a journeyman electrician and carpenter to
meet our current needs and new regulations.
19Operations custodial area
- The March review examined the job descriptions,
quality of service, cost, and efficiencies with
respect to both contract and division custodial
employees. - Trustees decided to maintain the status quo in
this area. - The Board targeted a reduction of 5 in space
usage in the schools. - - This reduction was in those buildings with the
lowest utilization. - - We ended up reducing 13 classrooms which is
equivalent to a 5 reduction in classroom space.
While the savings from this are modest it does
take the Division in the right direction.
20Operations buildings area
- An external consultant (Bill Shaeffer) reviewed
our buildings with respect to student capacity,
suitability for emerging needs, implications for
maintenance and repair, possible community needs,
and to effectively match space with future
student demographics. - - There is 25 more space for each Park West
student than the provincial average for rural
school divisions. - - We are planning comprehensive reviews of our
facilities so that this information can be
presented to our publics during the
restructuring meetings. - Our buildings are old and maintenance costs and
needs are significant. We need to invest
significantly in new wiring and cabling in the
technology area. It is a fiscally unsustainable
to do this maintenance for all of our school
facilities given changing demographics and
emerging program needs. - We have also met with the Public Schools Finance
Board to determine if provincial funding would be
in place if the decision is made to right size
our school facilities to student demographics.
The Public Schools Finance Board is very
interested in working with us as a pilot
division.
21Governance - Board evaluation
- The emphasis of our governance model is on policy
and data driven decisions. - - The Board is planning to complete the work
begun by Leroy Sloan on evaluation and policy
development. - New policies for school review and employee
evaluations were approved. -
22Governance - Evaluation of CEO
- This is a yearly requirement by the Board of
Trustees. - - The mandate of the Board is to evaluate the
CEO and not engage in the work of
administrators. - Under our policy, the CEO was evaluated in June
of 2006. - The Board is planning to evaluate their own
performance this spring.
23Fiscal sustainability
- The local levy is essential in financing the
education of our students. Given this fact,
communication with the public regarding the
budget is critical. - We need to keep infrastructure in line with both
educational needs and student numbers. - On an annual basis, we review our staffing
formulae, Divisional staff, the number of
buildings, class sizes, technology, subject
choices, and the use and distribution of
categorical funding - Like all Divisions, Park West retains a moderate
surplus as part of our plan for financial
management. - The Board allocates Vision 37 funds for important
Divisional initiatives.
24Governance - Board succession
- Park West School Division places tremendous value
on the role of our Board of Trustees. - The orientation of new and prospective trustees
is an ongoing priority. - - Considerable time is devoted to the training
of existing and prospective Board members.
25Changing role of trustees
- There is a need to promote and advocate for the
public education system. This requires examining
the manner by which divisions are financed. The
current model includes a combination of
provincial grants and local levy. - How do we effectively govern a continually
diminishing jurisdiction with expanding needs and
reduced resources? - Will there be opportunities for possible new
partnerships?
26Highlights of Divisional priorities
- Maintenance of programs currently in place
(example Music, Special Ed clinicians,
Vocational). - Literacy and Numeracy classroom support.
- Partnerships and agreements with First Nation
communities. - Leadership development for prospective
school-based administrators. - Maintenance of committees related to priorities.
- Third year of 45,000 Grant for assets
development to emphasize citizenship. - Support for inclusion of all students with
improvements in school accessibility (Bill 13).
27Highlights of Divisional priorities
- Notice incentive for departing teachers.
- Purchase of two new buses.
- Reduction of all school staff based on declining
student numbers. - We have not reduced the number of clinicians and
student services staff. The number of students
with special needs has actually remained constant
even though our overall numbers have dropped
considerably. - Technology investment in VLAN - 125 000.
- Support for professional development continued at
2006 levels.
28Surplus
- The Division used 569,859 of surplus to support
2005/06 school year. - Our surplus on June 30/06 equaled 1,662,912.
- - Our surplus remains in line with the auditors
recommendation. - - The Minister of Education would like surpluses
to be lower across the Province. - - However, unlike most Divisions, much of our
surplus is tied up in with our educational
partners. Our current outstanding restructured
debt is 540,000. - The amount of surplus being used to support
proposed 06/07 budget will be 68,993. - Trustees have always viewed the surplus as a
necessary fund to assist with restructuring. - - The policy of the Public Schools Finance Board
would allow some of these surplus funds to be
placed in a capital reserve for specified
restructuring projects.
29Vision 37
- The amount remaining in Vision 37 is 332,000.
- 100 000. of Vision 37 was allocated to Schools
prior to amalgamation. - 300 000. of Vision 37 funds was used to support
initiatives identified by School Administration
Group, including - - Maplewood admin and Library software 5 000.
- - Accounting software for all schools to meet
new accounting standards. 16 000. - - Internet software for all schools. 22 000.
- - Student summit costs 17 000.
- - VLAN pilot project 30 000.00.
30Total Enrollment
98/99 2436.0 99/00 2375.0 00/01
2334.0 01/02 2197.0 02/03
2203.0 03/04 2147.0 04/05
2138.0 05/06 2111.0 06/07
1904.5 07/08 1782.5
- Instructions
- This is an embedded table from Microsoft Word.
- To edit this table you need to have Microsoft
Word installed on your computer. You do not need
to have Word installed to view the table. - To edit this table simply double-click anywhere
on the table. When youre done editing the
table, click outside of the table to return to
PowerPoint.
From 06/07 to 07/08 a decline of 122 Students.
31Student Enrollment
32School Enrolment FTE
33School Teaching Staff
34Specialist Divisors
- There has been no change to the level of
- support for school specialists. The divisors
- remain unchanged.
- - School Admin K Senior 4 250 (min. .25)
- - Resource K Senior 4 200
- - Guidance 5 - Senior 4 350
35Educational Assistants
- Block - one hour for 15 students.
- Level 2 approximately 0.5 FTE E.A. for each
student or as required. - Level 3 approximately 1.0 FTE E.A. for each
student or as required.
36Secretaries
- Secretaries based on enrolment (hours allotted
daily) - 200 .18
- 150 to199 .20
- 100 to 149 .22
- 50 to 99 .24
- 0 to 49 .28
- Hours given to School Secretaries per 5 students
37Librarians
- Staffing here is based upon enrolment with a
- minimum of 1.5 hrs per day allocated to
- schools.
- Major Pratt 50/1
- K Senior 4 34/1
- K Grade 8 40/1
- 7 Senior 4 30/1
- Number of students per hour per day
38Custodians/Bus drivers
- 5 schools have contract custodians.
- 9 schools have custodian time based on the
formula 2900 Sq Ft 1 hr. - 13 contractors have 22 routes.
- 28 routes have 28 employee bus drivers.
39Division Staff
-
- 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08
- Speech and Language 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65
- Psychologist 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
- Information Technology0.75 0.875 0.75 0.90 1.00 1.
00 - Technicians 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
- I. T. Resource 0.375 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.50
- Curriculum Resource 0 0 0 0 0.50 0.50
- Counseling 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
- Field Foreman 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.50 0.50
- Maintenance 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.50
- Shop Foreman 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0
- Mechanics 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
- Shop Secretary -
- 0.5 0.5 .5 0.50 - Total 13.825 13.825 13.70 13.85 14.20 14.70
40Division Office Staff
- 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 0607 0708
- C.E.O./Supt 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
- Supt. of Programs - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0
.60 - Secretary Treasurer 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 - Director of Operations - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.
00 1.00 - Maintenance Supervisor 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0
- Transportation Supervisor 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0
- Student Services Coord.. 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 - Curriculum Coordinator - 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.
40 0.40 - Div Office Support Staff 6.00 6.00 5.75 6.00 6.00
5.40 5.40 - Total 13.00 12.00 11.50 11.50 11.50 10.40 10.40
41Total Employees FTE
- Division Office 10.40
- Division 14.20
- Teaching 125.10
- E.A.s (FTE based on 5.5 hr days) 61.78
- School Secretaries 12.55
- Librarians 8.00
- Custodians
- Contracts 5.00
- Non-contract (FTE 8 hrs) 10.75
- Bus drivers
- Contracts 22.00
- Non-contract 29.00
42Assessment 2007/08
Total Assessment 358,883,670 0.5 increase
05/06 Per pupil assessment 162,493 06/07 Per
pupil assessment 179,336 0708 Per pupil
assessment 189,384
43Provincial Revenue
- 2006/07 2007/08 Difference
- Base Support 6,372,513 6,339,597 (32,916)
-0.5 - Categorical Support 2,444,027 2,606,433
162,406 6.6 - Equalization 750,003 766,023
16,020 2.1 - Special Project 0 102,600 102,600
100.0 - D-Grant 102,507 111,060
8,553 8.3 - Total C.B.E. 9,669,050 9,925,713
256,663 2.7 - Vocational Equipment 35,500 35,400
-100 - 0.2 Total Support 9,704,550
9,961,113 256,563 2.7
Also the education rebate to farms and homeowners
will put about another 1.1 million into
Provincial revenue.
44Revenues 2007/08
- Provincial 9,961,113
- Other Income
- Payroll Tax rebate 270,000
- Tuition Fees 764,100
- Substitute Fees 1,000
- Interest 25,000
- Transfer fees 20,000
- Other 13,000
Total revenue before special levy 11,054,213.00
Down from last year by 23,420 or .02
45Revenue 2007/08
46Expenditures by Frame Categories
Total Expenditures 18,200,961
05/06 Average cost per student 8,809.00 06/07
Average cost per student 9,414.00 0708 Average
cost per student 10,210.92 Increase of 796.92
per student
up from last year by 339,808 Or 1.9
47Expenditure Summary
Blue is 0708 Green is 0607 Yellow is 0506
482007/2008 Special Levy Required
- Instructions
- This is an embedded table from Microsoft Word.
- To edit this table you need to have Microsoft
Word installed on your computer. You do not need
to have Word installed to view the table. - To edit this table simply double-click anywhere
on the table. When youre done editing the
table, click outside of the table to return to
PowerPoint.
Total Expenditure 18,200,961 Less
Provincial Revenue 9,961,113 Other
Revenue 1,093,100 Taken from surplus
0 Special Levy Requirement 7,146,748
49Calculation of 2007 Special Levy
Special Levy Requirement 06/07 budget
6,788,129 Amt. Related to 06/07 included in 2006
3,013,930 Bal of 06/07 to be raised in
2007 3,774,199 Spec Req. 2007/2008
budget 7,146,748 Amt included in 2007 Spec
Levy 3,173,156 Surplus(applied)(raise)
0 2007 Special Levy for DSFM 446,142 2007
Special Levy for Division 6,947,356 Total
Special Levy 7,393,498
Increase of 578,431.00 or 8.49
1,100,000 came as rebate from the prov govt
6,293,498 from local rate payers
502007 Mill Rate
20.60 MILLS
A mill rate should not be used as a comparison to
other divisions. We use the amount of special
levy collected per resident student.
07/08 we will collect 3,897.46 per student 06/07
we collected 3,425.52 per student
51Review
- Declining enrolment of 122 students.
- Reduce Teaching staff as per divisors by 9.725.
- Secretaries and Librarians as per divisors.
- Division Office Staff stays same.
- Provincial revenue up by 2.7 .
- Expenditures up by 1.9 totaling 18,200,961.
- Cost per student up by 797.
- 8.49 increase in Special Levy totally
7,393,498. - Special Levy per resident student is 3,897.46.
52Challenges for our Division
- We have declining enrolment. A drop of 500
students in todays provincial grant is
equivalent to 2.8 million. This decline has
resulted in a decrease of 1000 students since
1986. - There is taxpayer resistance to increases in the
local levy. - There are increased accountability expectations.
- There is a reduced capacity to meet increased
expectations of the public system in the areas of
vocational programs, arts education, languages,
and special education. - There are difficulties in recruitment and
retention in the above program areas.
53Challenges (continued)
- Equitable access to technology is an issue,
particularly bandwidth and investment in older
buildings for wiring and cabling. - There are increased transportation costs for
sparsely populated areas. - There appears to be a lack of vision on a rural
perspective by senior governments. - - There is a lack of adequate provincial
finances to support the full implementation of
their program and policy mandates. - - There is a lack of flexibility for local
divisions in the management and delivery of
their educational programs. - Joint lobbying of senior governments by
educational stakeholders is required.
54Challenges (continued)
- Educational finance is presently based on student
numbers which is a significant disadvantage for
rural divisions. - The equalization formula is a problem.
- Interagency collaboration is required with
Health, Justice, Child and Family Services,
municipal governments, and First Nation human
services agencies. - Facility reconfiguration or rationalization will
be a big issue. - We are currently living off our equity in
facilities, equipment, resource materials, and
employees. - There has been a downloading of governance and
expectations without the funding or flexibility
to meet these requirements
55Challenges (continued)
- New governance models or consortiums are needed
to provide shared services, project
collaboration, or facility use. - What programs should be provided for students in
kindergarten through grade 12? What would be the
responsibility of parents or families? - Instructional space needs to be appropriate to
the existing and emerging educational needs. - Meeting new building codes has big financial
implications. - Greater accountability is required both
financially and educationally (EDI, Grade 3,
Audit ). - There are increased numbers of special education
students - (Level 2 3 ).
56What we can agree about?
- The school division should meet the needs of the
present generation without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet their
educational needs. - School divisions are organized to provide for the
student educational services (Kindergarten
through Grade 12). They are not economic engines. - Park West School Division has experienced a loss
of nearly 500 students in the past eight years.
The adjustment for this demographic loss requires
reductions in the number of employees and bus
routes, the closure two schools, and increases in
the local levy.
57What we can agree about?
- If we lose a similar number of students in the
next eight to 10 years, there will have to be a
greater rationalization of facilities, new
partnerships, increased provincial grants, a
larger local levy, and reduced services. - We must meet to provincial mandate of educational
services, policies, and mandate. - Students and educational services to meet
existing and emerging needs are more important
than maintaining under-utilized facilities.
58What we can agree about?
- The need for change to meet these new challenges
should not be blamed on staff, administration,
trustees, parents, provincial government,
communities, or students. Scape-goating or
generalized blame is simply not helpful. - Status Quo will not work.
59Thank you for participating in this important
process.