Title: Internal Controls and Fraud: Current Hot Topics and Fraud Risks In State Agencies NAST
1Internal Controls and FraudCurrent Hot Topics
and Fraud Risks In State AgenciesNAST
- By Joseph R. Dervaes, CFE, ACFE Fellow, CIA
- Audit Manager for Special Investigations
- Washington State Auditors Office
-
- Vice-Chair, Board of Directors
- Association of Certified Fraud Examiners
2Plan for Success
- Two major expectations of citizens
-
- (1) Safeguard money while in your control
- (2) Spend money wisely and for authorized
purposes
3Plan for Success
- Tone at the top
- Walking the talk
- Fraud is not a matter of if, but when
- Protect your employees
- Communicate why controls are important
- Trust by verify
4Brief Checklist to Identify At Risk Employees
- Employee work habits
- (1) Come to work early or leave late
- (2) Works nights and weekends
- (3) Seldom missing for leave or vacation
- (4) Reports to office during brief absences
- (5) Ask others to hold work while gone
5The System of Internal Control
- What fraud perpetrators do
- They dont play by the rules
- (1) Ignore internal controls
- (2) Compromise internal controls
6Two Categories of Fraud Perpetrators
- Doers (first line employees)
- Reviewers (supervisors)
- Where are internal controls for each?
- (1) Doers (almost all)
- (2) Reviewers (practically none)
- Lack of monitoring by managers
7The Circle/Square Concept
- Circle Internal control procedures
- Square What employees really do
8Fraud StatisticsSate of Washington 1987-2004
- Number Amount
- Summary Statistics Of Cases Of Losses
- 18 Year Total 641 12,547,025
- 18 Year Average 36 697,057
9Current Hot Topics and Fraud Risks Actual Audit
Experience
- Routine Fraud Risks
- No fixed responsibility
- Bogus check fraud risk
- Money laundering
- Accounts receivable
- Payroll
- Critical Fraud Risks
- Monitoring employee tasks
- Subtle compromise of accounts payable
10No Fixed Responsibility
- Risk Inability to fix responsibility for losses
to specific person - Location Anywhere in organization
- Solution Employees sign for funds received from
others - The Rule Fix responsibility for money to a
particular person, at a particular point in time,
all the time - Caution Dont segregate duties if fixed
responsibility is destroyed
11Bogus Check Fraud Risk
- Risk Bogus checks created by outsiders will not
be identified promptly in bank reconciliation
process, resulting in a loss - Location Central treasurer
- Process Bank reconciliation
- (1) Main depository account (daily)
- Positive pay
- Reverse positive pay
- (2) Other checking accounts (monthly)
- Block all or filter certain electronic
transactions
12Money Laundering
- Risk Stolen revenue checks insiders
- Location Anywhere in organization
- Perpetrator Usually not the ones that received
the funds first - Solution Capture accountability for revenue
checks immediately upon receipt in the
organization
13Money Laundering
- Inside the organization
- (1) Check for cash substitution in bank deposit
- (2) Irregular deposits in bank accounts with
similar name as organization - (3) Irregular deposits in authorized bank
accounts in the organization - (4) Making cash-back withdrawals from bank
deposits - (5) Altering checks by increasing the amount
14Money Laundering
- Outside the organization
- (1) Deposits into bogus bank account for
organization - (2) Deposits into personal bank account
- (3) Cashing checks at bank or vendor
15Accounts Receivable
- Risk Employee steals accounts receivable
revenue - Methods of concealment
- (1) Write-off the account
- (2) Let the account go delinquent (risky)
- Solution Obtain and review computer-generated
exception reports listing all non-cash
transactions - Caution We often forget employees authorized to
write-off transactions can do it 24/7/365,
whether authorized or not - Additional advice An independent party should
receive and review all customer feedback about
account irregularities
16Accounts Receivable
Independent Party (Supervisor) Reconciliation
Clerk Position Billing/Posting/Adjustments No
Bills/Shut-Offs
Clerk Position Collecting Depositing
17Payroll The Perpetrator
- All employees (everyone can do something)
- Department timekeepers (who add unauthorized
hours of work) - Department managers (who sign their own time
sheets) - Payroll Department employees/managers (who add
unauthorized hours of work and delete their own
leave)
18The U-Turn Concept
- The Straight Line The U-Turn Concept
Source
Source
Approval (Supervisor)
Approval (Supervisor)
Payment (Payroll Processing)
Payment (Payroll Processing)
19The Five Most Common Payroll Fraud Schemes
- Ghost employees
- Mid-month payroll draws not deducted from
end-of-month payroll - Unauthorized employee pay
- COBRA program abuses
- Advance release of withheld funds
20Payroll Fraud Schemes
- Ghost employees (few)
- Attribute Employee never comes to work
- High risk employees Part-time, seasonal, or
temporary employees - Prevention Verify existence of employees by
payroll payout list using non-payroll employees
to validate
21Payroll Fraud Schemes
- Mid-month payroll draws not deducted from
end-of-month payroll (few) - Attribute Occurs in small organizations
- High risk employee Payroll Department employee
or manager - Prevention Review payroll records of key
managers
22Payroll Fraud Schemes
- Unauthorized employee pay (many)
- Attribute Fraud not systemic specific
employees only - High risk employee Department manager or
payroll timekeeper - Prevention Monitor payroll records for key
employees for unusual data
23Payroll Fraud Schemes
- COBRA program abuses (few)
- Attribute Employee benefits provided without
authorization, approval, or support - High risk employee Payroll Department employee
or manager or organization manager - Prevention Reconcile suspense funds
established to process program payments
24Payroll Fraud Schemes
- Advance release of withheld funds (few none in
Washington - yet) - Attribute Tax withholding checks issued to
bank and cashed before the payroll date - High risk employee Payroll Department manager
or Chief Financial Officer - Prevention Review endorsements on tax
withholding checks
25Monitoring Employee Tasks
- Risk The last person making the bank deposit
manipulates contents - Location Decentralized or central treasurer
- Solution Independent party monitoring
- How Verify check and cash composition of bank
deposits match mode of payment of cash receipting
records
26Monitoring Employee Tasks
Cash Receipting
Bank
Supervisory Cashier
Cashier
27Check and Cash Composition Verification Methods
- Obtain bank-validated deposit slip
- Verify composition on-line
- Unannounced cash count before deposit
- Have bank return deposit to entity
- Have bank copy deposit contents
28State Agency Fraud StatisticsState of
Washington 1995-2004
- Number Amount
- State Agency Summary Of Cases Of Losses
- Cash Receipts 16 118,466
- Cash Disbursements 29 2,450,840
- Other Assets 4 104,276
- Total State Agency Fraud Cases 49
2,673,582 - 10 Years
- Percentage of Total Fraud Cases 10.8
29.1 -
29State Agency Fraud StatisticsState of
Washington 1995-2004
- Number Amount
- Cash Receipts Summary Of Cases Of Losses
- Cash Receipting Irregularities 9
48,447 - Missing or Short Bank Deposits 2
36,051 - Missing Funds from Safes/Vaults 2
5,299 - Missing Funds from Checking Accounts
1 14,892 - Bogus Checks Clearing the Bank 1
12,594 - Petty Cash Fund Irregularities 1
1,183 - Total State Agency Cash Receipts Fraud Cases
16 118,466 - 10 Years
- Percentage of Total State Agency Fraud Cases
32.6 4.4
30State Agency Fraud StatisticsState of
Washington 1995-2004
- Number Amount
- Cash Disbursements Summary Of Cases Of
Losses - False Cash Disbursements 10
643,394 - False Contractor Reimbursements 1
839,071 - False Payments for Service to Vendors
1 839,707 - False Employee Travel Reimbursements
5 87,348 - Unauthorized Use of Gift Coupons 1
2,450 - Payroll 4 8,863
- Credit Card Abuse 4 18, 500
- Telephone Abuse 3 11,507
31State Agency Fraud StatisticsState of
Washington 1995-2004
- Number
Amount - Other Assets Summary Of Cases Of Losses
- Theft of Assets 4
104,276 - Total State Agency Other Assets Fraud Cases
4 104,276 - 10 Years
- Percentage of Total State Agency Fraud Cases
8.2 3.9 -
32Subtle Compromise of the Accounts Payable System
- Risk Individual obtains a negotiable instrument
and coverts it to cash for personal gain - Location Accounts payable and check
distribution - Perpetrator Inside the organization or outsider
with insider help
33Subtle Compromise of the Accounts Payable System
- Problems
- (1) One person performs accounting and data
processing functions - (2) Input and output duties are the kiss of
death in disbursement frauds - (3) Post-it? notes
- (4) Look for a straight-line from source to
accounts payable to check distribution
34The U-Turn Concept
- The Straight Line The U-Turn Concept
Transaction Initiator
Transaction Initiator
Accounts Payable Function
Accounts Payable Function
Check Distribution Section
Check Distribution Section
35Subtle Compromise of the Accounts Payable System
- Problems (Continued)
-
- (5) Prepare or obtain an exception report of
all U-Turn transactions - (6) Compromise of pseudo vendor codes
36Subtle Compromise of the Accounts Payable System
- Solutions
- (1) Review access controls
- (2) Prohibit one person from performing
accounting and data processing functions - (3) Document all exceptions to system by use of
Post-it? notes - (4) Ensure accounts payable employees process
transactions rather than initiate/create them
(supervisor approval)
37Subtle Compromise of the Accounts Payable System
- Solutions (Continued)
- (5) Accounts payable duties should not be
performed outside the function - (6) Obtain a computer-generated exception
report and review all pseudo vendor code
transactions for authorization, approval, and
support - (7) Ensure governing bodies closely monitor an
individual who has total control of all
transactions in a small organization (CFO/CEO)
38Subtle Compromise of the Accounts Payable System
- Solutions (Continued)
- (8) Monitor all refund transactions (negative
cash and high risk) - (9) Examine vendor contracts if high,
increasing, and unusual volumes exist
39Key Learning Objective for Today
- Attribute of completeness is critical to
understanding the risk for fraud
40Key Learning Objectives for Today
- Always seek (or prepare) computer-generated
exception reports to identify the universe of
known high risk transactions, such as -
- (1) Accounts receivable write-off transactions
- (2) Accounts payable
- (a) U-Turn transactions (Post-it? notes)
- (a1) Accounts payable function
- (a2) Check distribution section
- (b) Pseudo vendor codes (abuse, then fraud)
- (3) Payroll U-Turn transactions (at
supervisory position)
41Critical Fraud Risks
- Cash Receipts
- Monitor the last person who makes the bank
deposit - Cash Disbursements
- Employees with too much access and control
(segregation of duties) are the kiss of death.
Fraud will happen - Monitor contractor billings for propriety