Title: Northwest Flow Snow Events in the Southern Appalachian Mountains CSTAR Workshop 10/7/05
1Northwest Flow Snow Events in the Southern
Appalachian MountainsCSTAR Workshop10/7/05
2Outline
- Background
- Motivation
- Example/Problem
- Definition
- Questions Hypotheses
- Method
- Events
- Case 1 18-20 December 2003
- Case 2 20-21 January 2001
- Progress/Summary to Date
- Future Work
3Motivation
- Identified as a forecast problem by NWS offices
in vicinity of Appalachians (e.g., through
discussion with Larry Lee) - Operational models struggle forecasting these
events (resolution, moisture source, etc.) - Main aspects in question include total
accumulation, spatial extent
4Example/Problem
- 1.) Amount/local variability in upslope region
- 2.) Spatial extent across mountains
6 March 2001
25 January 2001
5Definition
- NW flow, in the lower levels, 850 mb
- Air parcels encounter mountains, orographic lift
occurs, extracting low-level moisture and
producing snowfall - Study area is the southern Appalachians including
areas from north Georgia to southeastern West
Virginia
6Questions
- What parameters do forecasters currently examine,
what other parameters could help? - What determines degree of spatial precipitation
variability / maximum accumulations in mountains?
- How far east of mountains will precipitation
extend? - Ability of high-resolution models (e.g. WRF) to
predict these events (optimal configuration?)
7Hypotheses
- Great Lakes are a significant source of moisture,
instability in some events (especially in heavier
events) (Perry and Konrad study) - Strength of synoptic forcing distinguishes
localized from more widespread event - Strength of low-level flow, moisture availability
dictate snow accumulations, coverage - High resolution WRF runs will provide more
accurate and detailed forecasts
8Method
- Case study approach
- Identify key parameters that can be utilized in
operational forecasting - Use WRF model to test sensitivity to Great Lakes,
mountains, model configuration and resolution
9Notable NW Flow Events
- 3 November 1999 Post Frontal
- 17-18 January 2000 NW Flow Aloft
- 20-21 January 2001 Cut-Off Low
- 25 January 2001 - Post Frontal
- 6 March 2001 Cut-Off Low
- 17 April 2001 Cut-Off Low
- 16-17 January 2003 Post Frontal
- 28-29 November 2003 Post Frontal
- 18-20 December 2003 Post Frontal
- 19 December 2004 Post Frontal
- 19 January 2005 NW Flow Aloft
- 20-21 January 2005 NW Flow Aloft
10Case 1 18-20 December 2003
11Case 1 18-20 December 2003
19z 18th
00z 19th
06z 19th
19z 19th
12Case 1 18-20 December 2003 18z 18th
13Case 1 18-20 December 2003BNA and RNK, 12z 19th
14Case 1 18-20 December 2003
- Presence of shortwave trough at 500 mb (shear
vorticity, cyclonic side of jet) - After weak surface low passage, strong deep-layer
W, NW flow - Also, very moist around 850 mb in BNA and RNK
soundings, instability? - Additional lift from vorticity maxima aloft and
enhanced orographic lift from strong low-level NW
flow
15Case 2 20-21 January 2001
16Case 2 20-21 January 2001
21z 20th
18z 20th
00z 21st
03z 21st
17Case 2 20-21 January 2001
18Case 2 20-21 January 2001BNA and RNK, 00z 21st
19Case 2 20-21 January 2001
- Strong, 500 mb closed low tracks eastward across
the mid-Atlantic - East coast cyclogenesis taking place during peak
NW flow time period - BNA and RNK soundings moist with 20-25 kt NW flow
at 850 mb
20Progress/Summary to Date
- Two cases identified for further study
- Identified other relevant cases
- Work with Perry and Konrad using detailed
climatology studies on patterns, topography, and
moisture source associated with NW flow snow
21Future Work
- Will identify cases for further hypothesis
testing - Great Lakes influence candidate Use model to
quantify role of lakes - Role of synoptic support in determining
precipitation distribution remove mountains,
isolate orographic signal - Test WRF resolution, physics configurations to
determine optimum configuration, required
resolution for NW snow prediction